Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37795499›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2023

Inequities in Epilepsy: A Scoping Review.

Merhawit Ghebrehiwet, Katherine Cox, Danya Nees, Bryan Dunford, Samuel M Jacobsen, Rigel Bacani, Matt Vassar

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neurological care for LGBT+ people.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Merhawit GhebrehiwetOffice of Medical Student Research (MG, KC, DN, BD, SMJ, RB, MV); and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (MV), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3386-166X
Katherine CoxOffice of Medical Student Research (MG, KC, DN, BD, SMJ, RB, MV); and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (MV), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1346-4667
Danya NeesOffice of Medical Student Research (MG, KC, DN, BD, SMJ, RB, MV); and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (MV), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9882-415X
Bryan DunfordOffice of Medical Student Research (MG, KC, DN, BD, SMJ, RB, MV); and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (MV), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7277-6815
Samuel M JacobsenOffice of Medical Student Research (MG, KC, DN, BD, SMJ, RB, MV); and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (MV), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9314-7962
Rigel BacaniOffice of Medical Student Research (MG, KC, DN, BD, SMJ, RB, MV); and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (MV), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1131-5097
Matt VassarOffice of Medical Student Research (MG, KC, DN, BD, SMJ, RB, MV); and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (MV), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to complete a scoping review of current literature surrounding health inequities in epilepsy while providing recommendations for future research. Methods: During July 2022, we searched MEDLINE and Ovid Embase to find published articles pertaining to epilepsy and health inequities. Initially, authors received training. Authors then screened, and data were extracted in a masked duplicate manner. Studies published within the time frame of 2011-2021 in all countries were deemed appropriate. We screened 5,325 studies for titles and abstracts and then 56 studies for full text. We evaluated the inequities of race/ethnicity, sex or gender, income, occupation status, education level, under-resourced/rural population, and LGBTQ+. To summarize the data and descriptive statistics of our study, we used Stata 17.0 (StataCorp, LLC, College Station, TX). Results: We obtained a sample size of 45 studies for study inclusion. The most reported health inequities were income (18/45, 40.0%), under-resourced/rural population (15/45, 33.3%), and race/ethnicity (15/45, 33.3%). The least reported health inequity was LGBTQ+ (0/45, 0.0%). Discussion: The findings of our study suggest that gaps exist in literature concerning epilepsy and inequities. The inequities of income status, under-resourced/rural population, and race/ethnicity were examined the most, while LGBTQ+, occupation status, and sex or gender were examined the least. With the ultimate goal of more equitable and patient-centered care in mind, it is vital that future studies endeavor to fill in these determined gaps.

Identifiers

PMID37795499
PMCPMC10547471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.