ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2023
Bioequivalence Study of Vortioxetine Hydrobromide Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioequivalence study of perampanel oral suspension in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Bioequivalence of a Generic Vortioxetine 20 mg Tablet in Healthy Mexican Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study compared the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of generic and original vortioxetine hydrobromide tablets under fasting and fed conditions, and evaluated the bioequivalence of two vortioxetine formulations to obtain sufficient evidence for abbreviated new drug application. Methods: A randomized, open-label, two-formulation, single-dose, two-period crossover bioequivalence study was conducted under fasting and fed conditions (n = 32 per study). Eligible healthy Chinese subjects received a single 10-mg dose of the test or reference vortioxetine hydrobromide tablet, followed by a 28-day washout interval between periods. Serial blood samples were collected up to 72 h after administration in each period, and the plasma concentrations of vortioxetine were detected using a validated method. The primary pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using the non-compartmental method. The geometric mean ratios for the PK parameters of the test drug to the reference drug and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals were acquired for bioequivalence analysis. A safety evaluation was performed throughout the study. Results: Under fasting and fed conditions, the PK parameters of the test drug were similar to those of the reference drug. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios of the test to reference formulations were 96.44-105.81% for peak concentration (C Conclusion: The PK bioequivalence of the test and reference vortioxetine hydrobromide tablets in healthy Chinese subjects was established under fasting and fed conditions, which met the predetermined regulatory criteria. Both formulations were safe and well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.