ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Cellular specificity of lactate metabolism and a novel lactate-related gene pair index for frontline treatment in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The new insights of lactate in various kidney diseases.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring the role of monocarboxylate transporter 4 in diverse KRAS mutation subtypes of colorectal Cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Applications of gene pair methods in clinical research: advancing precision medicine.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- The fall of the genome protectors triad: PBRM1, SETD2, and BAP1's impact on metabolism and immunity in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Developing hypoxia and lactate metabolism-related molecular subtypes and prognostic signature for clear cell renal cell carcinoma through integrating machine learning.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although lactate metabolism-related genes (LMRGs) have attracted attention for their effects on cancer immunity, little is known about their function in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The aim of this study was to examine the cellular specificity of lactate metabolism and how it affected the first-line treatment outcomes in ccRCC. Methods: GSE159115 was used to examine the features of lactate metabolism at the single-cell level. Utilizing the transcriptome, methylation profile, and genomic data from TCGA-KIRC, a multi-omics study of LMRG expression characteristics was performed. A prognostic index based on a gene-pair algorithm was created to assess how LMRGs affected patients' clinical outcomes. To simulate the relationship between the prognostic index and the frontline treatment, pRRophetic and Subclass Mapping were used. E-MTAB-1980, E-MTAB-3267, Checkmate, and Javelin-101 were used for external validation. Results: The variable expression of some LMRGs in ccRCC can be linked to variations in DNA copy number or promoter methylation levels. Lactate metabolism was active in tumor cells and vSMCs, and LDHA, MCT1, and MCT4 were substantially expressed in tumor cells, according to single-cell analysis. The high-risk patients would benefit from immune checkpoint blockade monotherapy (ICB) and ICB plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) therapy, whereas the low-risk individuals responded to mTOR-targeted therapy. Conclusions: At the single-cell level, our investigation demonstrated the cellular specificity of lactate metabolism in ccRCC. We proposed that the lactate-related gene pair index might be utilized to identify frontline therapy responders in ccRCC patients as well as predict prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.