Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37795442›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

ctDNA-based detection of molecular residual disease in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy.

Emily S Lebow, Narek Shaverdian, Jordan E Eichholz, Leah B Kratochvil, Megan McCune, Yonina R Murciano-Goroff, Justin Jee, Juliana Eng, Jamie E Chaft, Mark G Kris and 22 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Outcomes of Short-Course Consolidation Immunotherapy in Unresectable Stage III NSCLC.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The journal of liquid biopsy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily S LebowMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Narek ShaverdianMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Jordan E EichholzMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Leah B KratochvilMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Megan McCuneMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Yonina R Murciano-GoroffMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Justin JeeMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Juliana EngMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Jamie E ChaftWeill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States.
Mark G KrisMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Ekaterina KalashnikovaNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Jordan FeeneyNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Carly Bess ScaliseNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Sumedha SudhamanNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Charuta C PalsuledesaiNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Meenakshi MalhotraNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Michael KrainockNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Himanshu SethiNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Alexey AleshinNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Minetta C LiuNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Annemarie F ShepherdMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Abraham J WuMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Charles B SimoneMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Daphna Y GelblumMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Kaylie A JohnsonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Charles M RudinMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Daniel R GomezMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Pedram RazaviMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Jorge S Reis-FilhoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
James M IsbellMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Bob T LiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Andreas RimnerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNatera (United States) · USCornell University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sensitive and reliable biomarkers for early detection of recurrence are needed to improve post-definitive radiation risk stratification, disease management, and outcomes for patients with unresectable early-stage or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT). This prospective, multistate single-center, cohort study investigated the association of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status with recurrence in patients with unresectable stage I-III NSCLC who underwent definitive RT. Methods: A total of 70 serial plasma samples from 17 NSCLC patients were collected before, during, and after treatment. A personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay was used to track a set of up to 16 somatic, single nucleotide variants in the associated patient's plasma samples. Results: Pre-treatment ctDNA detection rate was 82% (14/17) and varied based on histology and stage. ctDNA was detected in 35% (6/17) of patients at the first post-RT timepoint (median of 1.66 months following the completion of RT), all of whom subsequently developed clinical progression. At this first post-RT time point, patients with ctDNA-positivity had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 24.2, p=0.004], and ctDNA-positivity was the only significant prognostic factor associated with PFS (HR: 13.4, p=0.02) in a multivariate analysis. All patients who developed clinical recurrence had detectable ctDNA with an average lead time over radiographic progression of 5.4 months, and post-RT ctDNA positivity was significantly associated with poor PFS (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Personalized, longitudinal ctDNA monitoring can detect recurrence early in patients with unresectable NSCLC patients undergoing curative radiation and potentially risk-stratify patients who might benefit most from treatment intensification.

Indexed as

circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)definitive radiationmolecular residual disease (MRD)non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)prognostic biomarkertumor-informed

Identifiers

PMID37795442
PMCPMC10546425
OpenAlexW4386895472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.