Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37795404›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2023

Dose difference between anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB) caused by target's air content for volumetric modulated arc therapy of head and neck cancer.

Takaaki Ito, Hajime Monzen, Kazuki Kubo, Hiroyuki Kosaka, Yuya Yanagi, Yusuke Sakai, Masahiro Inada, Hiroshi Doi, Yasumasa Nishimura

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takaaki ItoDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Hajime MonzenDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuki KuboDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroyuki KosakaDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Yuya YanagiDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Yusuke SakaiDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiro InadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi DoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Yasumasa NishimuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Kindai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We clarified the dose difference between the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB) with increasing target's air content using a virtual phantom and clinical cases. Materials and methods: Whole neck volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan was transferred into a virtual phantom with a cylindrical air structure at the center. The diameter of the air structure was changed from 0 to 6 cm, and the target's air content defined as the air/planning target volume (PTV) in percent (air/PTV) was varied. VMAT plans were recalculated by AAA and AXB with the same monitor unit (MU) and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) motions. The dose at each air/PTV (5%-30%) was compared between each algorithm with D Results: When air/PTV increased (5-30%), the dose differences between AAA and AXB for D Conclusion: The dose difference between AAA and AXB increased as the target's air content increased, and AXB_D

Indexed as

Acuros XB (AXB)anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA)head and neck cancer (HNC)

Identifiers

PMID37795404
PMCPMC10547402
OpenAlexW4387170868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.