Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37795350›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

EUS-guided therapies for primary and secondary prophylaxis in gastric varices-An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Saurabh Chandan, Andrew Khoi Nguyen, Babu P Mohan, Smit Deliwala, Daryl Ramai, Lena L Kassab, Arunkumar Muthusamy, Antonio Facciorusso, Faisal Kamal, Mohammad Bilal and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil-assisted retrograde transgastric occlusion of shunt efferent for gastric variceal bleeding.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. EUS-Guided Vascular Interventions: Recent Advances.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Saurabh ChandanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHI Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Andrew Khoi NguyenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Babu P MohanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Smit DeliwalaDivision of Gastroenterology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Daryl RamaiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Lena L KassabInternal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Arunkumar MuthusamyMNGI Digestive Health, MN, USA.
Antonio FacciorussoGastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Faisal KamalDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mohammad BilalDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jayanta SamantaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Douglas G AdlerCenter for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy (CATE), Centura Health, Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, CO, USA.
University of Utah · USCHI Health Creighton University Medical Center - Bergan Mercy · USEmory University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMinneapolis VA Health Care System · USMinnesota Gastroenterology · USPorter Adventist Hospital · USPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Foggia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Gastric varices (GVs) are associated with a higher risk of uncontrolled bleeding and death when compared with esophageal varices. While endoscopic glue injection therapy has been traditionally used for secondary prophylaxis in GV, data regarding primary prophylaxis continue to emerge. Recently, EUS-guided therapies have been used in GV bleeding. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of several major databases from inception to June 2022. Our primary goals were to estimate the pooled rates of treatment efficacy, GV obliteration, GV recurrence, and rebleeding with EUS-guided therapy in primary and secondary prophylaxis. Overall adverse events and technical failures were assessed. Random-effects model was used for our meta-analysis, and heterogeneity was assessed using the Results: Eighteen studies with 604 patients were included. In primary prophylaxis, pooled rate of GV obliteration was 90.2% (confidence interval [CI], 81.1-95.2; Conclusion: Our analysis shows that EUS-guided therapy for GVs is technically feasible and clinically successful in both primary and secondary prophylaxis of GV.

Indexed as

EUSGastric varicesVariceal hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID37795350
PMCPMC10547242
OpenAlexW4387357958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.