ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Routine breast milk monitoring using automated molecular assay system reduced postnatal CMV infection in preterm infants.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of low-volume plasma dilution protocols for human cytomegalovirus DNA quantification using the cobas CMV assay.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Cytomegalovirus in Pregnancy: Effects on the Developing Embryo and Fetus, Diagnosis and Treatment: Where to Go Now? A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Validation of a Real-Time PCR Assay for Fully Automated Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) transmitted through breast milk poses fatal risks to preterm infants. However, current molecular assay systems often do not accommodate breast milk samples. In this study, we evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the measurement procedure of CMV load in breast milk utilizing the Cobas CMV test on the Cobas 6,800 system. This was enabled by incorporating a simple independent sample preparation procedure before the application of samples on the automated assay system. Clinical data from electronic medical records were retrospectively analyzed. Breast milk samples from mothers of preterm infants born before 33 weeks of gestation were screened for CMV using the automated assay system. CMV positivity rates in breast milk and neonatal samples and the CMV transmission rate were calculated. Furthermore, to validate the analytical accuracy of the overall measurement procedure with newly obtained residual breast milk samples, the linearity of the measurement procedure was assessed, and a simplified sample preparation method was validated against a conventional method. The CMV positivity rates in maternal breast milk and neonatal samples were 57.8 and 5.2%, respectively. The CMV transmission rate through breast milk was 7.7%. No significant differences in gestational age or birth weight were found between the CMV-negative and CMV-positive neonates. The linearity of the procedure was observed within a range of 1.87-4.73 log IU/mL. The simplified sample preparation method had an equivalent or even improved CMV detection sensitivity than the conventional method. Incorporating a simple independent sample preparation procedure effectively resolved any potential issues regarding the application of breast milk on the automated assay system. Our approach contributed to reduced vertical transmission of CMV by providing a convenient and reliable method for the monitoring of breast milk CMV positivity for clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.