Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37795259›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2023

Disrupting Faculty-on-Faculty Bullying in Academic Medicine: An Innovative Workshop.

Maya S Iyer, David P Way, Doug MacDowell, Barbara Overholser, Reshma Jagsi, Nancy D Spector

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maya S IyerAssociate Professor of Pediatrics, Assistant Dean for Clinical Track Faculty, Director of Emergency Medicine Faculty Development, and Associate Director of Women in Medicine and Science, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University College of Medicine.
David P WaySenior Research Scientist in Education, Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine.
Doug MacDowellData Analyst, Nationwide Children's Hospital.
Barbara OverholserDirector of Stakeholder Engagement and Communications, Executive Leadership in Academic Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine.
Reshma JagsiLawrence W. Davis Professor and Chair, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine.
Nancy D SpectorProfessor of Pediatrics, Betty A. Cohen Chair in Women's Health, Senior Vice Dean for Faculty, Executive Director, Lynn Yeakel Institute for Women's Health and Leadership, and Executive Director, Executive Leadership in Academic Medicine and Executive Leadership in Health Care, Drexel University College of Medicine.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · USDrexel University · USEmory University · USLynn University · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bullying, a severe form of mistreatment, occurs when an individual in an authority position intentionally imposes negative persistent behaviors on a target. In academic medicine, bullying is used to impede the target's professional growth. While there is abundant literature on how to disrupt other forms of mistreatment, the literature related to bullying among academic medical faculty members is scarce. Methods: We developed an interactive workshop on disrupting faculty-on-faculty bullying in academic medicine, with a focus on gender-based bullying, following Kern's model of curriculum development. The workshop consisted of three didactics on the scope of bullying in academic medicine: identifying bullying behaviors, learning strategies to mitigate bullying, and understanding what constitutes comprehensive antibullying policies. The workshop also included three small-group activities to reinforce learned concepts. Results: Eighty-seven faculty attended one of three workshops held over a 6-month period. We received 24 completed evaluations for a 28% rate of return. Most participants rated workshop activities as being well taught and of great value. Many respondents commented that after participating in the workshop, they realized they had likely experienced or witnessed bullying in their careers and that mitigating bullying required effort at multiple levels (individual, institutional, national). Discussion: This workshop fills a need in academic medicine through addressing how faculty members and institutions can help themselves and others to disrupt bullying. We will continue to disseminate this workshop at national conferences and at individual institutions. This resource will allow other educators to offer the workshop at their home institutions.

Indexed as

BullyingMedicineFaculty, MedicalHumansLearningAntibullying PoliciesBullyingMistreatmentMitigation

Identifiers

PMID37795259
PMCPMC10545817
OpenAlexW4387308176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.