Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37795224›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2023

Biological dosimetric impact of dose-delivery time for hypoxic tumour with modified microdosimetric kinetic model.

Daisuke Kawahara, Yasushi Nagata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biomedicines · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daisuke KawaharaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Japan.
Yasushi NagataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Science, Hiroshima University, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: An improved microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) can address radiobiological effects with prolonged delivery times. However, these do not consider the effects of oxygen. The current study aimed to evaluate the biological dosimetric effects associated with the dose delivery time in hypoxic tumours with improved MKM for photon radiation therapy. Materials and methods: Cell survival was measured under anoxic, hypoxic, and oxic conditions using the Monte Carlo code PHITS. The effect of the dose rate of 0.5-24 Gy/min for the biological dose (D Results: The ratio of the D Conclusion: Our proposed model can estimate the cell killing and biological dose under hypoxia in a clinical and realistic patient. A shorter dose-delivery time with a higher oxygen distribution increased the radiobiological effect. It was more effective at higher doses per fraction than at lower doses.

Indexed as

dose deliveryhypoxicmicrodosimetric kinetic model

Identifiers

PMID37795224
PMCPMC10547428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.