Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37795210›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

CLET: Computation of Latencies in Event-related potential Triggers using photodiode on virtual reality apparatuses.

Piyush Swami, Klaus Gramann, Elise Klæbo Vonstad, Beatrix Vereijken, Alexander Holt, Tomas Holt, Grethe Sandstrak, Jan Harald Nilsen, Xiaomeng Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Piyush SwamiMotion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Klaus GramannBiological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Elise Klæbo VonstadMotion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Beatrix VereijkenDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Alexander HoltMotion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Tomas HoltMotion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Grethe SandstrakMotion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Jan Harald NilsenMotion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Xiaomeng SuMotion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate event-related activity in human brain dynamics as measured with EEG, triggers must be incorporated to indicate the onset of events in the experimental protocol. Such triggers allow for the extraction of ERP, i.e., systematic electrophysiological responses to internal or external stimuli that must be extracted from the ongoing oscillatory activity by averaging several trials containing similar events. Due to the technical setup with separate hardware sending and recording triggers, the recorded data commonly involves latency differences between the transmitted and received triggers. The computation of these latencies is critical for shifting the epochs with respect to the triggers sent. Otherwise, timing differences can lead to a misinterpretation of the resulting ERPs. This study presents a methodical approach for the CLET using a photodiode on a non-immersive VR (i.e., LED screen) and an immersive VR (i.e., HMD). Two sets of algorithms are proposed to analyze the photodiode data. The experiment designed for this study involved the synchronization of EEG, EMG, PPG, photodiode sensors, and ten 3D MoCap cameras with a VR presentation platform (Unity). The average latency computed for LED screen data for a set of white and black stimuli was 121.98 ± 8.71 ms and 121.66 ± 8.80 ms, respectively. In contrast, the average latency computed for HMD data for the white and black stimuli sets was 82.80 ± 7.63 ms and 69.82 ± 5.52 ms. The codes for CLET and analysis, along with datasets, tables, and a tutorial video for using the codes, have been made publicly available.

Indexed as

electroencephalography (EEG)event-related potential (ERP)interfacelatenciesmotion-capture (Mocap)

Identifiers

PMID37795210
PMCPMC10546026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.