ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Leveraging natural cognitive systems in conjunction with ResNet50-BiGRU model and attention mechanism for enhanced medical image analysis and sports injury prediction.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-powered biomechanical modeling for ACL-reconstructed knees: predicting knee joint contact forces via computer vision and deep learning.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Dual-channel fluorescence biosensor for simultaneous miR-133a and ATP detection in living muscle cells.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based identification of esophageal cancer subtypes through analysis of high-resolution histopathology images.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In this study, we explore the potential benefits of integrating natural cognitive systems (medical professionals' expertise) and artificial cognitive systems (deep learning models) in the realms of medical image analysis and sports injury prediction. We focus on analyzing medical images of athletes to gain valuable insights into their health status. Methods: To synergize the strengths of both natural and artificial cognitive systems, we employ the ResNet50-BiGRU model and introduce an attention mechanism. Our goal is to enhance the performance of medical image feature extraction and motion injury prediction. This integrated approach aims to achieve precise identification of anomalies in medical images, particularly related to muscle or bone damage. Results: We evaluate the effectiveness of our method on four medical image datasets, specifically pertaining to skeletal and muscle injuries. We use performance indicators such as Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Structural Similarity Index, confirming the robustness of our approach in sports injury analysis. Discussion: Our research contributes significantly by providing an effective deep learning-driven method that harnesses both natural and artificial cognitive systems. By combining human expertise with advanced machine learning techniques, we offer a comprehensive understanding of athletes' health status. This approach holds potential implications for enhancing sports injury prevention, improving diagnostic accuracy, and tailoring personalized treatment plans for athletes, ultimately promoting better overall health and performance outcomes. Despite advancements in medical image analysis and sports injury prediction, existing systems often struggle to identify subtle anomalies and provide precise injury risk assessments, underscoring the necessity of a more integrated and comprehensive approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.