Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37795175›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

Current advances in the structural biology and molecular engineering of PETase.

Fei Liu, Tao Wang, Wentao Yang, Yingkang Zhang, Yuming Gong, Xinxin Fan, Guocheng Wang, Zhenhua Lu, Jianmin Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Novel aspects of ethylene glycol catabolism.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fei Liu *School of Biological Science, Jining Medical University, Rizhao, China.
Tao WangSchool of Biological Science, Jining Medical University, Rizhao, China.
Wentao Yang *School of Biological Science, Jining Medical University, Rizhao, China.
Yingkang Zhang *School of Biological Science, Jining Medical University, Rizhao, China.
Yuming Gong *School of Biological Science, Jining Medical University, Rizhao, China.
Xinxin Fan *School of Biological Science, Jining Medical University, Rizhao, China.
Guocheng Wang *School of Biological Science, Jining Medical University, Rizhao, China.
Zhenhua LuCollege of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jianmin WangSchool of Pharmacy, Jining Medical University, Rizhao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is a highly useful synthetic polyester plastic that is widely used in daily life. However, the increase in postconsumer PET as plastic waste that is recalcitrant to biodegradation in landfills and the natural environment has raised worldwide concern. Currently, traditional PET recycling processes with thermomechanical or chemical methods also result in the deterioration of the mechanical properties of PET. Therefore, it is urgent to develop more efficient and green strategies to address this problem. Recently, a novel mesophilic PET-degrading enzyme (

Indexed as

biodegradationIsPETaseMHETasePoly(ethylene terephthalate)protein engineering

Identifiers

PMID37795175
PMCPMC10546322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.