Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37795130›Full record

ReviewJournal of transplantation2023

The Leading Transplantation Journals: A Trend Analysis, 2011-2021.

Badi Rawashdeh, Saif Aldeen Alryalat, Joohyun Kim, Calvin Eriksen, Mohammad Abu Assi, Raj Prasad, Matthew Cooper

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Badi RawashdehDivision of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4193-4654
Saif Aldeen AlryalatFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5588-9458
Joohyun KimDivision of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5371-2317
Calvin EriksenDivision of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Mohammad Abu AssiFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9728-6310
Raj PrasadDivision of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6061-001X
Matthew CooperDivision of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3438-9638
Medical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Jordan · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As the field of transplantation has expanded, so have the quantity and variety of articles published on the topic. Evaluation of publications and journals is crucial to the expansion of transplant research. This study investigated the research output and journal metrics of the leading solid organ transplant journals published between 2011 and 2021 based on estimations of the trends in the category CiteScore from the Scopus database. Materials and Methods: We obtained data on the listed journals from the Scopus Source List. We then filtered the list for "Transplantation" journals. Only the top quartiles or quartile 1 (Q1) journals were placed in this category. This study focused specifically on transplantation journals and did not include other journals related to diseases of transplanted organs such as the kidney, liver, heart, and lungs. Results: The number of transplantation journals increased by 42.8% in the last ten years, from 28 in 2011 to 40 in 2021. Between 2011 and 2021, nine transplantation journals ranked in the highest quartile (Q1). The American Journal of Transplantation was the top journal in both years, with a 150% increase in citations and an 11.2% increase in articles published. Open access (OA) transplant journals rose from 3 in 2011 to 10 in 2021. In 2021, OA journals earned 8,555 citations, a 125% increase from 2011. Despite this increase, non-OA journals received more citations than OA in 2021 ( Conclusion: Solid organ transplantation advances lead to more publications and citations. Regular journals and publications evaluation benefits academics and policymakers by promoting the growth of research. This study examined solid organ transplantation journals and gave a global perspective on transplant journal rankings and compared their status in 2011 and 2021.

Identifiers

PMID37795130
PMCPMC10547570
OpenAlexW4387038607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.