Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37795070›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

How Safety Culture Surveys Influence the Quality and Safety of Healthcare Organisations.

Rob M Bethune, Sue Ball, Natasha Doran, Michael Harris, Antionieta Medina-Lara, Mauro Fornasiero, Matt Hill, Iain Lang, Judith McGregor-Harper, Rod Sheaff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Translation of the agency for health care research and quality nursing home survey on patient safety for Swedish conditions.Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rob M BethuneColorectal Surgery, Royal Exeter University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, GBR.
Sue BallNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration, South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, GBR.
Natasha DoranNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration, South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, GBR.
Michael HarrisCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, GBR.
Antionieta Medina-LaraDepartment of Public Health and Sports Science, Public Health Economics Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, GBR.
Mauro FornasieroSchool of Law and Criminology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, GBR.
Matt HillAnaesthesia, University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, GBR.
Iain LangNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration, South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, GBR.
Judith McGregor-HarperHealth Policy, Care Quality Commission, London, GBR.
Rod SheaffFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives Safety culture surveys have been widely used in healthcare for more than two decades predominantly as a tool for measuring the level of safety culture (as defined as the beliefs and attitudes that staff express about how their organisation ought to work and how it does in fact work). However, there is the potential for the survey process itself to influence the safety culture and working practices in departments and organisations. The objective of this study was to identify the mechanism by which these changes might occur. Design, setting and participants Mixed methods combining qualitative semi-structured interviews and quantitative scores from patient safety surveys. This evaluation was conducted across general practice, community and acute hospitals in two NHS regions in England; South West and Greater Manchester. The study was undertaken between 2015 and 2018 during the implementation of a series of Patient Safety Collaboratives. Safety, Communication, Operational Reliability, and Engagement (SCORE) surveys were administered in 15 units, followed by a staff debriefing and a second SCORE survey. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians (n=61). Results from the first and second surveys were compared in order to test for differences in responses. Sixty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted across participating units and thematically analysed.  Analysis and results Results from the first and second surveys were compared using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Sixty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted across participating units and thematically analysed.  There was little change in responses between the first and second SCORE surveys. Within general practice there was some improvement in responses in three survey domains; however, these differences were not conclusive. The qualitative interview data demonstrated a beneficial effect on safety culture. Staff stated that the survey debriefings created a new safe space where problems could be discussed and improvement plans created.  Conclusions Safety culture surveys can improve safety culture within departments if they are followed by a process that includes debriefing the staff and working with them to develop improvement plans.

Indexed as

culturehealth policy makingqualitativequalitative semi-structured interviewsqualitative studiessafetysurveys

Identifiers

PMID37795070
PMCPMC10546949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.