Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37795016›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Livestock health and disease economics: a scoping review of selected literature.

Alexander Kappes, Takesure Tozooneyi, Golam Shakil, Ashley F Railey, K Marie McIntyre, Dianne E Mayberry, Jonathan Rushton, Dustin L Pendell, Thomas L Marsh

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
33.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Genomic profiling of ESBL/AmpC-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexander KappesThe Lewin Group, Falls Church, VA, United States.
Takesure TozooneyiDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Golam ShakilSchool of Economic Sciences and Paul G. Allen School for Global Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Ashley F RaileyDepartment of Sociology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States.
K Marie McIntyreModelling, Evidence and Policy Group, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Dianne E MayberryCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Jonathan RushtonInstitution of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Dustin L PendellDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Thomas L MarshSchool of Economic Sciences and Paul G. Allen School for Global Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Kansas State University · USWashington State University · USAgriculture and Food · AULewin Group (United States) · USNewcastle University · GBOklahoma State University · USUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal diseases in production and subsistence environments have the potential to negatively affect consumers, producers, and economies as a whole. A growing global demand for animal sourced food requires safe and efficient production systems. Understanding the burden of animal disease and the distribution of burden throughout a value chain informs policy that promotes safe consumption and efficient markets, as well as providing more effective pathways for investment. This paper surveys existing knowledge on the burden of animal disease across economic categories of production, prevention and treatment, animal welfare, and trade and regulation. Our scoping review covers 192 papers across peer-reviewed journals and reports published by organizations. We find there exists a gap in knowledge in evaluating what the global burdens of animal diseases are and how these burdens are distributed in value chains. We also point to a need for creating an analytical framework based on established methods that guides future evaluation of animal disease burden, which will provide improved access to information on animal health impacts.

Indexed as

animal health economicsconsumer demandglobal burden of animal diseaselivestock productiontrade and regulations

Identifiers

PMID37795016
PMCPMC10546065
OpenAlexW4386966648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.