Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37794960›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023

Comparison of simultaneous auscultation and ultrasound for clinical assessment of bowel peristalsis in neonates.

Archana Priyadarshi, Mark Tracy, Pankhuri Kothari, Chiranjibi Sitaula, Murray Hinder, Faezeh Marzbanrad, Stephanie Morakeas, Amit Trivedi, Nadia Badawi, Sheryl Rogerson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Archana PriyadarshiDepartment of Neonatology, Westmead Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mark TracyDepartment of Neonatology, Westmead Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Pankhuri KothariDepartment of Neonatology, Westmead Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chiranjibi SitaulaDepartment of Electrical & Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Murray HinderGrace Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, The Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Faezeh MarzbanradDepartment of Electrical & Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Stephanie MorakeasDepartment of Neonatology, Westmead Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Amit TrivediGrace Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, The Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nadia BadawiGrace Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, The Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sheryl RogersonDepartment of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Westmead Hospital · AUChildren's Hospital at Westmead · AUMonash University · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Assessment of bowel health in ill preterm infants is essential to prevent and diagnose early potentially life-threatening intestinal conditions such as necrotizing enterocolitis. Auscultation of bowel sounds helps assess peristalsis and is an essential component of this assessment. Aim: We aim to compare conventional bowel sound auscultation using acoustic recordings from an electronic stethoscope to real-time bowel motility visualized on point-of-care bowel ultrasound (US) in neonates with no known bowel disease. Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study in neonates on full enteral feeds with no known bowel disease. A 3M™ Littmann® Model 3200 electronic stethoscope was used to obtain a continuous 60-s recording of bowel sounds at a set region over the abdomen, with a concurrent recording of US using a 12l high-frequency Linear probe. The bowel sounds heard by the first investigator using the stethoscope were contemporaneously transferred for a computerized assessment of their electronic waveforms. The second investigator, blinded to the auscultation findings, obtained bowel US images using a 12l Linear US probe. All recordings were analyzed for bowel peristalsis (duration in seconds) by each of the two methods. Results: We recruited 30 neonates (gestational age range 27-43 weeks) on full enteral feeds with no known bowel disease. The detection of bowel peristalsis (duration in seconds) by both methods (acoustic and US) was reported as a percentage of the total recording time for each participant. Comparing the time segments of bowel sound detection by digital stethoscope recording to that of the visual detection of bowel movements in US revealed a median time of peristalsis with US of 58%, compared to 88.3% with acoustic assessment ( Conclusion: Our study demonstrates disconcordance between the detection of bowel sounds by auscultation and the detection of bowel motility in real time using US in neonates on full enteral feeds and with no known bowel disease. Better innovative methods using artificial intelligence to characterize bowel sounds, integrating acoustic mapping with sonographic detection of bowel peristalsis, will allow us to develop continuous neonatal bowel sound monitoring devices.

Indexed as

abdominal ultrasoundauscultationbowel peristalsisneonatal bowel soundsneonates

Identifiers

PMID37794960
PMCPMC10546054
OpenAlexW4386853245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.