Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37794953›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Assessment of Direct Costs of Admission Due to Presumed Microbial Keratitis in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Thailand: A 7-Year Retrospective Study.

Somporn Chantra, Peranut Chotcomwongse, Supachase Jittreprasert, Wirapha Senarak, Anyarak Amornpetchsathaporn, Parinee Kemchoknatee, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Somporn ChantraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0319-4384
Peranut ChotcomwongseDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Supachase JittreprasertDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wirapha Senarak *Department of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anyarak Amornpetchsathaporn *Department of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Parinee KemchoknateeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7153-0813
Paisan RuamviboonsukDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rajavithi Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the direct healthcare cost of admission and examine the effects of cost drivers of treating presumed microbial keratitis (MK) at a tertiary referral hospital. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: A total of 741 patients who presented with MK were included. All information regarding costs was collected, and demographic data were employed for risk factor analysis. Results: The total cost of treating MK over a 7-year period at Rajavithi Hospital was US$14,514,625.04, while the median cost was US$10,840.17 per patient (Q1-3, US$5866.56-24,172.28). The medical professional services were the highest cost category in terms of both total cost of treatment over 7 years and median cost per patient, accounting for US$6,474,718.43 and US$5235.20 (Q1-3, US$2582.79-10,474.24) respectively. In 2020, the total cost of treatment declined, corresponding with fewer hospitalized patients; however, the median cost per patient was the highest of all years, amounting to US$15,089.90 (Q1-3, US$8064.17-29102.50), while the median cost per patient from 2014 to 2019 was US$9969.96 (Q1-3, US$5177.98-21,942.68). Statistical significance was found in the median cost per patient in 2020 compared to the median cost per patient in 2014-2019 (p-value 0.019). Risk factors associated with the more expensive cost of treatment were longer length of stay (LOS); age more than 60 years old; readmission; diabetes mellitus (DM); hypertension; and heart disease. Conclusion: There were several key factors impacting the direct healthcare costs of severe MK treatment. Medical professional services emerged as the most substantial cost category, while longer hospital stays, older age groups, readmission cases, and comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and heart disease were all linked to elevated treatment expenses. There were no statistically significant differences in the direct medical expenses during hospitalization associated with treating severe MK, whether the culture results were positive or negative, or regardless of the type of cultured organism utilized.

Indexed as

corneal ulcereconomic burdenhealthcare costinfectious keratitis

Identifiers

PMID37794953
PMCPMC10547063
OpenAlexW4387189816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.