Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37794782›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2023

Skinfolds compressibility and digital caliper's time response in skinfold measurement in male and female young adults.

Raquel Vaquero-Cristóbal, Ana Catarina-Moreira, Francisco Esparza-Ros, Carlos Barrigas, Mario Albaladejo-Saura, Filomena Vieira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Skinfolds Measurement Protocols and Standards: A Narrative Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Raquel Vaquero-CristóbalFaculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2708-4817
Ana Catarina-MoreiraInstituto Politécnico de Lisboa, H&TRC-Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL-Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7031-6738
Francisco Esparza-RosInternational Kinanthropometry Chair, UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4519-1635
Carlos BarrigasInstituto de Estudos Interculturais e Transdisciplinares, Fisiologia e Bioquímica do Exercício, Almada, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9541-7359
Mario Albaladejo-SauraInternational Kinanthropometry Chair, UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0234-7756
Filomena VieiraUniversity of Lisbon, Laboratory of Biomechanics and Functional Morphology, Interdisciplinary Centre for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), Faculty of Human Kinetics (FMH), Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7547-5487
Universidad Católica de Murcia · ESInstituto Politécnico de Lisboa · PTUniversidad de Murcia · ESUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe skinfold caliper reading of the skinfold thickness depends on its dynamic compressibility. This has led to the fact that, while it is indicated that skinfold readings should be taken when the reading is stable, there is no consensus on at what second the reading should be taken after the application of the skinfold caliper. The new Lipowise PRO digital skinfold caliper was used to analyze the evolution of skinfold readings under skinfold caliper pressure. The aim of the present investigation were: a) to analyze the evolution of the reading time of individual skinfolds when subjected to skinfold caliper pressure and when the skinfold reading reaches stability; b) to describe the physical behavior of skinfold tissues' time response to skinfold caliper pressure, and to explore differences between sites and subjects' skinfolds compressibility; and c) to analyze the sex differences in both the reading and the evolution of the skinfold over time.

methodsA descriptive cross-sectional design was followed with a convenience sample of 165 healthy young adults (79 males and 86 females), with eight skinfolds measured using the Lipowise PRO skinfold caliper. The Lipowise PRO skinfold caliper uses a programmable reading time allowing for the measurement of the skinfold's thickness at a rate of 100 times per second, and monitoring skinfold behavior over the 3-second measurement period, thereby enabling the assessment of the tissue response to the constant force exerted by the skinfold caliper jaws.

resultsAll skinfolds showed statistical differences in terms of compressibility characteristics (

conclusionA skinfold caliper application, using the digital caliper Lipowise PRO, of three seconds may be sufficient for achieving stability in the measurement and for obtaining the minimum value for most individual and sum of skinfolds. However, there are certain skinfolds that may require more time when performed on certain individuals, which vary according to sex.

Indexed as

LegThighAdipose TissueCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRegression AnalysisSkinfold ThicknessYoung Adultanthropometrybody compositionfat massresponse timeskinfold caliperSkinfold thickness

Identifiers

PMID37794782
PMCPMC10557569
OpenAlexW4387357039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.