ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2023
The influence of bone model geometries on the determination of skull acoustic properties.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the impact of various simulated skull bone geometries on the determination of skull speed of sound and acoustic attenuation values via optimization using transmitted pressure amplitudes beyond the bone. Using the hybrid angular spectrum method (HAS), we simulated ultrasound transmission through four model sets of different geometries involving sandwiched layers of diploë and cortical bone in addition to three models generated from CT images of ex-vivo human skull-bones. We characterized cost-function solution spaces for each model and, using optimization, found that when a model possessed appreciable variations in resolvable layer thickness, the predefined attenuation coefficients could be found with low error (RMSE < 0.01 Np/cm). However, we identified a spatial frequency cutoff in the models' geometry beyond which the accuracy of the property determination begins to fail, depending on the frequency of the ultrasound source. There was a large increase in error of the attenuation coefficients determined by the optimization when the variations in layer thickness were above the identified spatial frequency cutoffs, or when the lateral variations across the model were relatively low in amplitude. For our limited sample of three CT-image derived bone models, the attenuation coefficients were determined successfully. The speed of sound values were determined with low error for all models (including the CT-image derived models) that were tested (RMSE < 0.4 m/s). These results illustrate that it is possible to determine the acoustic properties of two-component models when the internal bone structure is taken into account and the structure satisfies the spatial frequency constraints discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.