Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37794514›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2023

Factors influencing emotional support of older adults living in the community: a scoping review protocol.

Rashmi Devkota, Greta Cummings, Kathleen F Hunter, Colleen Maxwell, Shovana Shrestha, Liz Dennett, Matthias Hoben

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rashmi DevkotaFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. rdevkota@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5797-563X
Greta CummingsFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Kathleen F HunterFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Colleen MaxwellSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Shovana ShresthaFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Liz DennettJohn W. Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Matthias HobenFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmotional support is key to improve older adults' subjective health, and psychological, social and emotional well-being. However, many older adults living in the community lack emotional support, increasing the risk for loneliness, depression, anxiety, potentially avoidable healthcare use and costs, and premature death. Multiple intersecting factors may influence emotional support of older adults in the community, but these are poorly understood. Studies have focused on specific populations (e.g., older adults with depression, cancer). Although relevant, these studies may not capture modifiable factors for the wider and more diverse population of older adults living in the community. Our scoping review will address these important gaps. We will identify and synthesize the evidence on factors that influence emotional support of older adults in the community.

methodsWe will use the Johanna Briggs Institute updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews to guide our review process. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA Psycinfo, CINAHL, Dissertations and Theses Global, and Scopus from inception. We will include studies published in English, examining factors influencing emotional support of older adults residing in community, without restrictions on the study design or year of publication. We will also include gray literature (dissertations and reports). Two independent reviewers will conduct title, abstract, and full-text screening, as well as risk of bias assessment, using validated quality appraisal tools based on study designs. Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus. The primary reviewer will extract the data from all studies, and the second reviewer will check the extractions of all the studies. We will use descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis for analysis. Family/friend caregivers and older adults involved as an advisory group will help with explaining the findings in terms of whether associations observed reflect their experiences and reality. We will analyze the discussion and generate themes, and summarize in a narrative form. DISCUSSION: This scoping review may identify factors that could be modified or mitigated to improve emotional support provision for older adults residing in community. The knowledge will inform the development of tailored interventions directed to older adults and their caregivers. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4TAEB (associated project link: osf.io/6y48t).

Indexed as

CaregiversLonelinessAgedHumansScoping Reviews as TopicCommunityEmotional supportOlder adultsPublic health

Identifiers

PMID37794514
PMCPMC10548654
OpenAlexW4387338782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.