Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37794513›Full record

ReviewJournal of eating disorders2023

Psychotherapies for eating disorders: findings from a rapid review.

Haley Russell, Phillip Aouad, Anvi Le, Peta Marks, Danielle Maloney, National Eating Disorder Research Consortium, Stephen Touyz, Sarah Maguire

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of eating disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Bulimia nervosa.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Haley Russell *InsideOut Institute, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Level 2, Charles Perkins Centre (D17), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Phillip Aouad *InsideOut Institute, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Level 2, Charles Perkins Centre (D17), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. phillip.aouad@sydney.edu.au.
Anvi LeHealthcare Management Advisors, Melbourne, Australia.
Peta MarksInsideOut Institute, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Level 2, Charles Perkins Centre (D17), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Danielle MaloneyInsideOut Institute, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Level 2, Charles Perkins Centre (D17), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
National Eating Disorder Research Consortium
Stephen TouyzInsideOut Institute, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Level 2, Charles Perkins Centre (D17), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Sarah MaguireInsideOut Institute, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Level 2, Charles Perkins Centre (D17), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUDeakin University · AULa Trobe University · AUFlinders University · AUWestern Sydney University · AUAustralian National University · AUAustralian Psychological Society · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AURamsay Health Care (Australia) · AUSydney Local Health District · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUTranslational Research Institute · AUUNSW Sydney · AUWestmead Hospital · AUCentre for Clinical Interventions · AUChildren’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AUChildren's Hospital at Westmead · AUCurtin University · AUHollywood Private Hospital · AUHunter New England Local Health District · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychotherapy is considered central to the effective treatment of eating disorders-focusing on behavioural, psychological, and social factors that contribute to the illness. Research indicates psychotherapeutic interventions out-perform placebo, waitlist, and/or other treatments; but, outcomes vary with room for major improvement. Thus, this review aims to (1) establish and consolidate knowledge on efficacious eating disorder psychotherapies; (2) highlight select emerging psychotherapeutic interventions; and (3) identify knowledge gaps to better inform future treatment research and development.

methodsThe current review forms part of a series of Rapid Reviews published in a special issue in the Journal of Eating Disorders to inform the development of the Australian-government-funded National Eating Disorder Research and Translation Strategy 2021-2031. Three databases were searched for studies published between 2009 and 2023, published in English, and comprising high-level evidence studies (meta-analyses, systematic reviews, moderately sized randomised controlled studies, moderately sized controlled-cohort studies, and population studies). Data pertaining to psychotherapies for eating disorders were synthesised and outlined in the current paper.

results281 studies met inclusion criteria. Behavioural therapies were most commonly studied, with cognitive-behavioural and family-based therapies being the most researched; and thus, having the largest evidence-base for treating anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder. Other therapies, such as interpersonal and dialectical behaviour therapies also demonstrated positive treatment outcomes. Emerging evidence supports specific use of Acceptance and Commitment; Integrative Cognitive Affective; Exposure; Mindfulness; and Emotionally-Focused therapies; however further research is needed to determine their efficacy. Similarly, growing support for self-help, group, and computer/internet-based therapeutic modalities was noted. Psychotherapies for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder; other, and unspecified feeding and eating disorders were lacking evidence.

conclusionsCurrently, clinical practice is largely supported by research indicating that behavioural and cognitive-behavioural psychotherapies are most effective for the treatment of eating disorders. However, the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions varies across studies, highlighting the need for investment and expansion of research into enhanced variants and novel psychotherapies to improve illness outcomes. There is also a pressing need for investigation into the whole range of eating disorder presentations and populations, to determine the most effective interventions.

Indexed as

Behavioural therapies cognitive behavioural therapyDialectical behavioural therapyEating disordersFamily-based therapyInterventionPsychotherapiesTherapiesTreatment

Identifiers

PMID37794513
PMCPMC10548609
OpenAlexW4387335162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.