Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37794511›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Feasibility, acceptability, and outcome responsiveness of the SYMPERHEART intervention to support symptom perception in persons with heart failure and their informal caregivers: a feasibility quasi-experimental study.

Gabrielle Cécile Santos, Maria Liljeroos, Kelly Tschann, Kris Denhaerynck, Justine Wicht, Corrine Y Jurgens, Roger Hullin, Petra Schäfer-Keller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabrielle Cécile SantosSchool of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8104-1987
Maria LiljeroosDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Kelly TschannSchool of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Kris DenhaerynckInstitute of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Justine WichtService d'Aide et de Soins à Domicile de La Sarine, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Corrine Y JurgensWilliam F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA.
Roger HullinDepartment of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Petra Schäfer-KellerSchool of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Fribourg, Switzerland. petra.schaefer-keller@hefr.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptom perception is an important process of heart failure (HF) self-care that persons with HF need in order to master self-care management. It also leads to better patient outcomes. Symptom perception consists of body observation and analysis, which are both challenging. We aimed to test the feasibility, acceptability, and outcome responsiveness of a novel intervention (SYMPERHEART) delivered to persons with HF with their informal caregiver.

methodsWe designed SYMPERHEART as a complex evidence-informed education and support intervention targeting body observation and analysis. We conducted a feasibility quasi-experimental study with a single group pre-post-test design. We included three subsamples: persons with HF receiving home-based care, their informal caregivers exposed to SYMPERHEART, and home-care nurses who delivered SYMPERHEART during 1 month. We assessed feasibility by recruitment time, time to deliver SYMPERHEART, eligibility rate, and intervention fidelity. We assessed acceptability by consent rate, retention rate, persons with HF engagement in body observation, and treatment acceptability. Outcome responsiveness was informed by patient-reported (PRO) and clinical outcomes: HF self-care and the informal caregivers' contribution to HF self-care, perception of HF symptom burden, health status, caregivers' burden, and HF events. We performed descriptive analyses for quantitative data and calculated Cohen's d for PROs. A power analysis estimated the sample size for a future full-scale effectiveness study.

resultsWe included 18 persons with HF, 7 informal caregivers, and 9 nurses. Recruitment time was 112.6 h. The median time to deliver SYMPERHEART for each participant was 177.5 min. Eligibility rate was 55% in persons with HF. Intervention fidelity revealed that 16 persons with HF were exposed to body observation and analysis. Consent and retention rates in persons with HF were 37.5% and 100%, respectively. Participants engaged actively in symptom and weight monitoring. Treatment acceptability scores were high. Symptom perception and informal caregivers' contribution to symptom perception were found to be responsive to SYMPERHEART. We estimate that a sample size of 50 persons with HF would be needed for a full-scale effectiveness study.

conclusionsSYMPERHEART was found to be feasible and acceptable. This feasibility study provides information for a subsequent effectiveness study.

trial registrationISRCTN. ISRCTN18151041 , retrospectively registered on 4 February 2021, ICTRP Search Portal.

Indexed as

AcceptabilityClinical trialComplex interventionFeasibilityFeasibility quasi-experimental studyHeart failureInformal caregiversSelf-careSymptom perception

Identifiers

PMID37794511
PMCPMC10548691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.