Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37794459›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2023

State of the art on the separation and purification of proteins by magnetic nanoparticles.

Thanh-Do Le, Itthanan Suttikhana, Tolulope Joshua Ashaolu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Applications of bioactive peptides in cosmeceuticals: a review.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thanh-Do LeInstitute for Global Health Innovations, Faculty of Medicine, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Vietnam.
Itthanan SuttikhanaDepartment of Multifunctional Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture and Technology, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Tolulope Joshua AshaoluInstitute for Global Health Innovations, Faculty of Medicine, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Vietnam. tolulopejoshuaashaolu@duytan.edu.vn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for excellent, affordable, rapid, reusable and biocompatible protein purification techniques is justified based on the roles of proteins as key biomacromolecules. Magnetic nanomaterials nowadays have become the subject of discussion in proteomics, drug delivery, and gene sensing due to their various abilities including rapid separation, superparamagnetism, and biocompatibility. These nanomaterials also referred to as magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) serve as excellent options for traditional protein separation and analytical methods because they have a larger surface area per volume. From ionic metals to carbon-based materials, MNPs are easily functionalized by modifying their surface to precisely recognize and bind proteins. This review excavates state-of-the-art MNPs and their functionalizing agents, as efficient protein separation and purification techniques, including ionic metals, polymers, biomolecules, antibodies, and graphene. The MNPs could be reused and efficaciously manipulated with these nanomaterials leading to highly improved efficiency, adsorption, desorption, and purity rate. We also discuss the binding and selectivity parameters of the MNPs, as well as their future outlook. It is concluded that parameters like charge, size, core-shell, lipophilicity, lipophobicity, and surface energy of the MNPs are crucial when considering protein selectivity, chelation, separation, and purity.

Indexed as

Magnetite NanoparticlesAdsorptionMagneticsPolymersMagnetite NanoparticlesPolymersIMACMagnetic nanoparticlesPoly-his pre-tagged proteinsProtein separation and purificationSurface modification

Identifiers

PMID37794459
PMCPMC10548632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.