Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37794432›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Ambulatory knee biomechanics and muscle activity 2 years after ACL surgery: InternalBrace

Linda Bühl, Sebastian Müller, Corina Nüesch, Katherine A Boyer, Erica Casto, Annegret Mündermann, Christian Egloff

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04429165 (RetroBRACE II), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04429165 completednot on this map

RetroBRACE II: Clinical and Functional Outcomes 2 Years After ACL Repair and InternalBrace Ligament Augmentation in Comparison With ACL Reconstruction - Considering Socioeconomic Aspects and Return to Work

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2020 to 2022Enrolled68ConditionsInjury of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL)Armscollection of Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) data, collection of anthropometric and clinical functional data, gait analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Linda BühlDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, 4031, Switzerland. linda.buehl@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3746-2033
Sebastian MüllerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, 4031, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5842-7371
Corina NüeschDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, 4031, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7526-9536
Katherine A BoyerDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5947-4057
Erica CastoDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8757-4538
Annegret MündermannDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, 4031, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6472-1689
Christian EgloffDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, 4031, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6867-0527
University of Basel · CHUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about knee mechanics and muscle control after augmented ACL repair. Our aim was to compare knee biomechanics and leg muscle activity during walking between the legs of patients 2 years after InternalBrace

methodsTwenty-nine ACL-IB, 27 sex- and age-matched ACL-R (hamstring tendon autograft) and 29 matched controls completed an instrumented gait analysis. Knee joint angles, moments, power, and leg muscle activity were compared between the involved and uninvolved leg in ACL-IB (paired t-tests), and between the involved legs in ACL patients and the non-dominant leg in controls (analysis of variance and posthoc Bonferroni tests) using statistical parametric mapping (SPM, P < 0.05). Means and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of differences in discrete parameters (DP; i.e., maximum/minimum) were calculated.

resultsSignificant differences were observed in ACL-IB only in minimum knee flexion angle (DP: 2.4°, CI [-4.4;-0.5]; involved > uninvolved) and maximum knee flexion moment during stance (-0.07Nm/kg, CI [-0.13;-0.00]; involved < uninvolved), and differences between ACL-IB and ACL-R only in maximum knee flexion during swing (DP: 3.6°, CI [0.5;7.0]; ACL-IB > ACL-R). Compared to controls, ACL-IB (SPM: 0-3%GC, P = 0.015; 98-100%, P = 0.016; DP: -6.3 mm, CI [-11.7;-0.8]) and ACL-R (DP: -6.0 mm, CI [-11.4;-0.2]) had lower (maximum) anterior tibia position around heel strike. ACL-R also had lower maximum knee extension moment (DP: -0.13Nm/kg, CI [-0.23;-0.02]) and internal knee rotation moment (SPM: 34-41%GC, P < 0.001; DP: -0.03Nm/kg, CI [-0.06;-0.00]) during stance, and greater maximum semitendinosus activity before heel strike (DP: 11.2%maximum voluntary contraction, CI [0.1;21.3]) than controls.

conclusionOur results suggest comparable ambulatory knee function 2 years after ACL-IB and ACL-R, with ACL-IB showing only small differences between legs. However, the differences between both ACL groups and controls suggest that function in the involved leg is not fully recovered and that ACL tear is not only a mechanical disruption but also affects the sensorimotor integrity, which may not be restored after surgery. The trend toward fewer abnormalities in knee moments and semitendinosus muscle function during walking after ACL-IB warrants further investigation and may underscore the importance of preserving the hamstring muscles as ACL agonists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT04429165 (12/06/2020).

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate LigamentAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesBiomechanical PhenomenaCase-Control StudiesHumansKnee JointMuscle, SkeletalAnterior cruciate ligamentHamstring autograftKinematics and kineticsMuscle activationPrimary repair

Identifiers

PMID37794432
PMCPMC10548591
OpenAlexW4387338852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.