Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37794207›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

The Oxford Utilitarianism Scale: Psychometric properties of a French adaptation (OUS-Fr).

Robin Carron, Nathalie Blanc, Royce Anders, Emmanuelle Brigaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robin CarronDepartment of Psychology, EPSYLON Laboratory UR4556, University Paul Valéry, Montpellier 3, F34000, Montpellier, France.
Nathalie BlancDepartment of Psychology, EPSYLON Laboratory UR4556, University Paul Valéry, Montpellier 3, F34000, Montpellier, France.
Royce AndersDepartment of Psychology, EPSYLON Laboratory UR4556, University Paul Valéry, Montpellier 3, F34000, Montpellier, France.
Emmanuelle BrigaudDepartment of Psychology, EPSYLON Laboratory UR4556, University Paul Valéry, Montpellier 3, F34000, Montpellier, France. Emmanuelle.Brigaud@univ-montp3.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that one's sense of morality may be readily influenced by one's culture, education, and life situation. Very few psychometric tools are currently available to measure facets of human morality in different cultures. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to develop a French adaptation of the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale (OUS-Fr) and formally evaluate its validity. The OUS-Fr was developed through a process of back-translation and administered to a sample of 552 participants. Results from exploratory factor analyses revealed a bidimensional structure with satisfactory loadings that was then also supported in the confirmatory factor analysis check. The OUS-Fr scale demonstrated good psychometric properties, with acceptable internal consistency and coherent results in the convergent validity analyses. These findings contribute to morality measurement literature by providing evidence for the reliability and validity of the French adaptation of the OUS. The OUS-Fr can be viewed as a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners for assessing utilitarian tendencies within the French-speaking population, which could pave the way for cross-cultural understandings that are important for fully understanding the intricacies of human morality.

Indexed as

MoralsPsychometricsAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Cultural ComparisonEthical TheoryFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultConfirmatory factor analysisConvergent validityMoral dilemmasOxford Utilitarianism Scale

Identifiers

PMID37794207
PMCPMC11289020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.