Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37794119›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2023

Participant characteristics in the prevention of gestational diabetes as evidence for precision medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Siew Lim, Wubet Worku Takele, Kimberly K Vesco, Leanne M Redman, Wesley Hannah, Maxine P Bonham, Mingling Chen, Sian C Chivers, Andrea J Fawcett, Jessica A Grieger and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of inositol supplementation for the prevention and treatment of gestational diabetes in pregnant women: Results from an umbrella meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 20 institutions in 26 countries.

Siew LimEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. siew.lim1@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5333-6451
Wubet Worku Takele *Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kimberly K Vesco *Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Oakland, USA.
Leanne M Redman *Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Wesley Hannah *Madras Diabetes Research Foundation Chennai, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4163-247X
Maxine P BonhamDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mingling ChenMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7992-1838
Sian C ChiversDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4060-2714
Andrea J FawcettAnn & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jessica A GriegerAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Nahal HabibiAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Gloria K W LeungDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kai LiuDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Eskedar Getie MekonnenGlobal Health Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Maleesa PathiranaAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Alejandra QuinterosAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4976-4932
Rachael TaylorSchool of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Gebresilasea G UkkeEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Shao J ZhouSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
ADA/EASD PMDI
Jami JosefsonNorthwestern University/ Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA. JJosefson@luriechildrens.org.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKBroad Institute · USNorthwestern University · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBChinese University of Hong Kong · HKLund University · SEThe University of Adelaide · AUEastern Health · AUJoslin Diabetes Center · USMonash University · AUNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of South Dakota · USAmerican Diabetes Association · USBaylor College of Medicine · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FR

Funding

Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Sujoy Ghosh · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
Promoting fat loss during pregnancy in women with grade 2 and 3 obesityR01DK124806 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI PHELAN, SUZANNE, REDMAN, LEANNE MAREE · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
Aberrant DNA Methylation Underlying Prenatal Exposures and Increased Newborn and Childhood AdiposityR01DK118403 · NIDDK · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI JOSEFSON, JAMI L · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK118403NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK124806Wellcome Trust 210752/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrecision prevention involves using the unique characteristics of a particular group to determine their responses to preventive interventions. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the participant characteristics associated with responses to interventions in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevention.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Pubmed to identify lifestyle (diet, physical activity, or both), metformin, myoinositol/inositol and probiotics interventions of GDM prevention published up to May 24, 2022.

resultsFrom 10347 studies, 116 studies (n = 40940 women) are included. Physical activity results in greater GDM reduction in participants with a normal body mass index (BMI) at baseline compared to obese BMI (risk ratio, 95% confidence interval: 0.06 [0.03, 0.14] vs 0.68 [0.26, 1.60]). Combined diet and physical activity interventions result in greater GDM reduction in participants without polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) than those with PCOS (0.62 [0.47, 0.82] vs 1.12 [0.78-1.61]) and in those without a history of GDM than those with unspecified GDM history (0.62 [0.47, 0.81] vs 0.85 [0.76, 0.95]). Metformin interventions are more effective in participants with PCOS than those with unspecified status (0.38 [0.19, 0.74] vs 0.59 [0.25, 1.43]), or when commenced preconception than during pregnancy (0.21 [0.11, 0.40] vs 1.15 [0.86-1.55]). Parity, history of having a large-for-gestational-age infant or family history of diabetes have no effect on intervention responses.

conclusionsGDM prevention through metformin or lifestyle differs according to some individual characteristics. Future research should include trials commencing preconception and provide results disaggregated by a priori defined participant characteristics including social and environmental factors, clinical traits, and other novel risk factors to predict GDM prevention through interventions.

Identifiers

PMID37794119
PMCPMC10551015
OpenAlexW4387345179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.