Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37793925›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Quantifying the mental health and economic impacts of prospective Universal Basic Income schemes among young people in the UK: a microsimulation modelling study.

Tao Chen, Howard Reed, Fiorella Parra-Mujica, Elliott Aidan Johnson, Matthew Johnson, Martin O'Flaherty, Brendan Collins, Chris Kypridemos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tao ChenDepartment of Public Health, Policy & Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5489-6450
Howard ReedSocial Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4577-1178
Fiorella Parra-MujicaSchool of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0974-7528
Elliott Aidan JohnsonSocial Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0937-6894
Matthew JohnsonSocial Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9987-7050
Martin O'FlahertyDepartment of Public Health, Policy & Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8944-4131
Brendan CollinsDepartment of Public Health, Policy & Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3023-8189
Chris KypridemosDepartment of Public Health, Policy & Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK C.Kypridemos@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0746-9229

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 223553/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUniversal Basic Income (UBI)-a largely unconditional, regular payment to all adults to support basic needs-has been proposed as a policy to increase the size and security of household incomes and promote mental health. We aimed to quantify its long-term impact on mental health among young people in England.

methodsWe produced a discrete-time dynamic stochastic microsimulation that models a close-to-reality open cohort of synthetic individuals (2010-2030) based on data from Office for National Statistics and Understanding Society. Three UBI scheme scenarios were simulated: Scheme 1-Starter (per week): £41 per child; £63 per adult over 18 and under 65; £190 per adult aged 65+; Scheme 2-Intermediate (per week): £63 per child; £145 per adult under 65; £190 per adult aged 65+; Scheme 3-Minimum Income Standard level (per week): £95 per child; £230 per adult under 65; £230 per adult aged 65+. We reported cases of anxiety and depression prevented or postponed and cost savings. Estimates are rounded to the second significant digit.

resultsScheme 1 could prevent or postpone 200 000 (95% uncertainty interval: 180 000 to 210 000) cases of anxiety and depression from 2010 to 2030. This would increase to 420 000(400 000 to 440 000) for Scheme 2 and 550 000(520 000 to 570 000) for Scheme 3. Assuming that 50% of the cases are diagnosed and treated, Scheme 1 could save £330 million (£280 million to £390 million) to National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services (PSS), over the same period, with Scheme 2 (£710 million (£640 million to £790 million)) or Scheme 3 (£930 million (£850 million to £1000 million)) producing more considerable savings. Overall, total cost savings (including NHS, PSS and patients' related costs) would range from £1.5 billion (£1.2 billion to £1.8 billion) for Scheme 1 to £4.2 billion (£3.7 billion to £4.6 billion) for Scheme 3.

conclusionOur modelling suggests that UBI could substantially benefit young people's mental health, producing substantial health-related cost savings.

Indexed as

Mental HealthState MedicineAdolescentAdultChildCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandHealth Care CostsHumansIncomeanxiety disordersdepression & mood disordershealth economicsmental healthpublic health

Identifiers

PMID37793925
PMCPMC10551934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.