Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37793919›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Effects of tele-prehabilitation on clinical and muscular recovery in patients awaiting knee replacement: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Stefania Guida, Jacopo Vitale, Silvia Gianola, Greta Castellini, Eva Swinnen, David Beckwée, Cecilia Gelfi, Enrica Torretta, Laura Mangiavini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05668312 (Effects of Tele-prehabilitation on Clinical and Muscular Recover in Patients Waiting for Knee Replacement), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05668312 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effects of Tele-prehabilitation on Clinical and Muscular Recover in Patients Waiting for Knee Replacement: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'AmbrogioRan2023 to 2025Enrolled68ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsTele-prehabilitation, Standard prehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefania GuidaUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Milan, Italy stefania.guida@grupposandonato.it.ORCID 0000-0002-1809-061X
Jacopo VitaleSpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Silvia GianolaUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Milan, Italy.
Greta CastelliniUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3345-8187
Eva SwinnenDepartment of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
David BeckwéeRehabilitation Research Deparment, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9951-9993
Cecilia GelfiLaboratory of Proteomics and Lipidomics, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Milan, Italy.
Enrica TorrettaLaboratory of Proteomics and Lipidomics, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Milan, Italy.
Laura MangiaviniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITVrije Universiteit Brussel · BEUniversity of Milan · ITSchulthess-Klinik · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing prevalence of knee osteoarthritis and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) impose a significant socioeconomic burden in developed and developing countries. Prehabilitation (rehabilitation in the weeks immediately before surgery) may be crucial to prepare patients for surgery improving outcomes and reducing assistance costs. Moreover, considering the progress of telemedicine, candidates for TKA could potentially benefit from a tele-prehabilitation programme. We aim to evaluate the effects of a home-based tele-prehabilitation program for patients waiting for total knee replacement. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Forty-eight male patients, aged 65-80, on a waiting list for TKA will be recruited and randomly assigned to the tele-prehabilitation intervention or control groups. Both groups will undergo the same 6-week exercise program (five sessions/week) and the same educational session (one per week). The tele-prehabilitation group will perform asynchronous sessions using a tablet, two accelerometers and a balance board (Khymeia, Padova, Italy), while the control group will use a booklet. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Questionnaire, at the end of the prehabilitation, will be the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes will include self-reported outcomes, performance tests and change in expressions of blood and muscle biomarkers. Ten healthy subjects, aged 18-30, will be also recruited for muscle and blood samples collection. They will not undergo any intervention and their data will be used as benchmarks for the intervention and control groups' analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This randomised controlled trial will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (Milan, Italy. No. 50/INT/2022). The research results will be published in peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05668312.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneeCosts and Cost AnalysisExercise TherapyHumansMalePreoperative ExerciseRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeClinical TrialKneeOrthopaedic & trauma surgeryREHABILITATION MEDICINETelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37793919
PMCPMC10551960
OpenAlexW4387328298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.