Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37793916›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Critical success factors for high routine immunisation performance: a qualitative analysis of interviews and focus groups from Nepal, Senegal, and Zambia.

Zoe Sakas, Kyra A Hester, Anna Ellis, Emily A Ogutu, Katie Rodriguez, Robert Bednarczyk, Sameer Dixit, William Kilembe, Moussa Sarr, Matthew C Freeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zoe SakasGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4979-8757
Kyra A HesterGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Anna EllisGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emily A OgutuGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Katie RodriguezGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Robert BednarczykGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sameer DixitCenter for Molecular Dynamics Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
William KilembeRwanda Zambia HIV Research Group, Emory University, Lusaka, Zambia.
Moussa SarrInstitut de Recherche en Santé de Surveillance Epidémiologique et de Formations, Dakar, Senegal.ORCID 0000-0003-2372-6632
Matthew C FreemanGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA matthew.freeman@emory.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1517-2572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesVaccination averts an estimated 2-3 million deaths annually. Although vaccine coverage improvements across Africa and South Asia have remained below global targets, several countries have outperformed their peers with significant increases in coverage. The objective of this study was to examine these countries' vaccination programmes and to identify and describe critical success factors that may have supported these improvements.

designMultiple case study design using qualitative research methods.

settingThree countries with high routine immunisation rates: Nepal, Senegal, and Zambia.

participantsWe conducted 207 key informant interviews and 71 focus group discussions with a total of 678 participants. Participants were recruited from all levels, including government officials, health facility staff, frontline workers, community health workers, and parents. Participants were recruited from both urban and rural districts in Nepal, Senegal, and Zambia.

resultsOur data revealed that the critical success factors for vaccination programmes relied on the cultural, historical, and statutory context in which the interventions were delivered. In Nepal, Senegal, and Zambia, high immunisation coverage was driven by (1) strong governance structures and healthy policy environments; (2) adjacent successes in health system strengthening; (3) government-led community engagement initiatives, and (4) adaptation considering contextual factors at all levels of the health system.

conclusionsThroughout this project, our analysis returned to the importance of defining and understanding the context, governance, financing, and health systems within a country, rather than focusing on any one intervention. This paper augments findings from existing literature by highlighting how contextual factors impact implementation decisions that have led to improvements in childhood vaccine delivery. Findings from this research may help identify transferable lessons and support actionable recommendations to improve national immunisation coverage in other settings.

Indexed as

VaccinationVaccinesFocus GroupsHumansNepalSenegalZambiaVaccinesPaediatric infectious disease & immunisationPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID37793916
PMCPMC10551940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.