Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37793909›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Intonation Units in Spontaneous Speech Evoke a Neural Response.

Maya Inbar, Shir Genzer, Anat Perry, Eitan Grossman, Ayelet N Landau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. How Low-Frequency Neural Activity Structures Language in Time.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Disentanglement of prosodic meaning: Toward a framework for the analysis of nonverbal information in speech.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. A universal of speech timing: Intonation units form low-frequency rhythms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Speech Prosody Serves Temporal Prediction of Language via Contextual Entrainment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maya InbarDepartment of Linguistics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel maya.inbar@gmail.com ayelet.landau@mail.huji.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0002-5273-9881
Shir GenzerDepartment of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel.
Anat PerryDepartment of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel.
Eitan GrossmanDepartment of Linguistics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel.
Ayelet N LandauDepartment of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel maya.inbar@gmail.com ayelet.landau@mail.huji.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous speech is produced in chunks called intonation units (IUs). IUs are defined by a set of prosodic cues and presumably occur in all human languages. Recent work has shown that across different grammatical and sociocultural conditions IUs form rhythms of ∼1 unit per second. Linguistic theory suggests that IUs pace the flow of information in the discourse. As a result, IUs provide a promising and hitherto unexplored theoretical framework for studying the neural mechanisms of communication. In this article, we identify a neural response unique to the boundary defined by the IU. We measured the EEG of human participants (of either sex), who listened to different speakers recounting an emotional life event. We analyzed the speech stimuli linguistically and modeled the EEG response at word offset using a GLM approach. We find that the EEG response to IU-final words differs from the response to IU-nonfinal words even when equating acoustic boundary strength. Finally, we relate our findings to the body of research on rhythmic brain mechanisms in speech processing. We study the unique contribution of IUs and acoustic boundary strength in predicting delta-band EEG. This analysis suggests that IU-related neural activity, which is tightly linked to the classic Closure Positive Shift (CPS), could be a time-locked component that captures the previously characterized delta-band neural speech tracking.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationElectroencephalographyHumansLanguagedelta-band speech trackingelectroencephalographygeneral linear modelintonation unitsspeech prosodyspontaneous speech processing

Identifiers

PMID37793909
PMCPMC10697392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.