Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37793405›Full record

ReviewArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2023

Neuropsychology of epilepsy surgery and theory-based practice: an opinion review.

Panayiotis Patrikelis, Lambros Messinis, Vasileios Kimiskidis, Stylianos Gatzonis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Panayiotis PatrikelisUniversity of Athens, School of Medicine, Evangelismos Hospital, Epilepsy Surgery Unit, National and Kapodistrian 1st Department of Neurosurgery, Laboratory of Clinical Neuropsychology, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-4474-7566
Lambros MessinisAristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3216-9025
Vasileios KimiskidisAristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, 1st Department of Neurology, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3335-3019
Stylianos GatzonisUniversity of Athens, School of Medicine, Evangelismos Hospital, Epilepsy Surgery Unit, National and Kapodistrian 1st Department of Neurosurgery, Laboratory of Clinical Neuropsychology, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6498-3929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review attempts to discuss how some of the central concepts from the Lurian corpus of theories are relevant to the modern neuropsychology of epilepsy and epilepsy surgery. Through the lenses of the main Lurian concepts (such as the qualitative syndrome analysis), we discuss the barriers to clinical reasoning imposed by quadrant-based views of the brain, or even atheoretical, statistically-based and data-driven approaches. We further advice towards a systemic view inspired by Luria's clinical work and theorizing, given their importance towards our clinical practice, by contrasting it to the modular views when appropriate. Luria provided theory-guided methods of assessment and rehabilitation of higher cortical functions. Although his work did not specifically address epilepsy, his theory and clinical approaches actually apply to the whole neuropathology spectrum and accounting for the whole panorama of neurocognition. This holistic and systemic approach to the brain is consistent with the network approach of the neuroimaging era. As to epilepsy, the logic of cognitive functions organized into complex functional systems, contrary to modular views of the brain, heralds current knowledge of epilepsy as a network disease, as well as the concept of the functional deficit zone.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersEpilepsyBrainCognitionHumansNeuropsychology

Identifiers

PMID37793405
PMCPMC10550352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.