Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37793087›Full record

ArticleGenetics2024

Dissection of the role of a Src homology 3 domain in the evolution of binding preference of paralogous proteins.

Pascale Lemieux, David Bradley, Alexandre K Dubé, Ugo Dionne, Christian R Landry

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Paralogs of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pascale LemieuxInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS), Université Laval, 1030, Avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6.
David BradleyInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS), Université Laval, 1030, Avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6.
Alexandre K DubéInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS), Université Laval, 1030, Avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6.
Ugo DionneInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS), Université Laval, 1030, Avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6.
Christian R LandryInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS), Université Laval, 1030, Avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6.
PROTEO · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

CIHR 387697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) drive many cellular processes. Some interactions are directed by Src homology 3 (SH3) domains that bind proline-rich motifs on other proteins. The evolution of the binding specificity of SH3 domains is not completely understood, particularly following gene duplication. Paralogous genes accumulate mutations that can modify protein functions and, for SH3 domains, their binding preferences. Here, we examined how the binding of the SH3 domains of 2 paralogous yeast type I myosins, Myo3 and Myo5, evolved following duplication. We found that the paralogs have subtly different SH3-dependent interaction profiles. However, by swapping SH3 domains between the paralogs and characterizing the SH3 domains freed from their protein context, we find that very few of the differences in interactions, if any, depend on the SH3 domains themselves. We used ancestral sequence reconstruction to resurrect the preduplication SH3 domains and examined, moving back in time, how the binding preference changed. Although the most recent ancestor of the 2 domains had a very similar binding preference as the extant ones, older ancestral domains displayed a gradual loss of interaction with the modern interaction partners when inserted in the extant paralogs. Molecular docking and experimental characterization of the free ancestral domains showed that their affinity with the proline motifs is likely not the cause for this loss of binding. Taken together, our results suggest that a SH3 and its host protein could create intramolecular or allosteric interactions essential for the SH3-dependent PPIs, making domains not functionally equivalent even when they have the same binding specificity.

Indexed as

Proteinssrc Homology DomainsAmino Acid SequenceBinding SitesMolecular Docking SimulationProlineProtein BindingProlineProteinsancestral sequence reconstructiongene duplicationmyosinsSRC homology 3 (SH3) domain

Identifiers

PMID37793087
PMCPMC10763533
OpenAlexW4387329128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.