Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792893›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2023

Functional dissection and assembly of a small, newly evolved, W chromosome-specific genomic region of the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis.

Caroline M S Cauret, Danielle C Jordan, Lindsey M Kukoly, Sarah R Burton, Emmanuela U Anele, Jacek M Kwiecien, Marie-Theres Gansauge, Sinthu Senthillmohan, Eli Greenbaum, Matthias Meyer and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Caroline M S CauretBiology Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Danielle C JordanEugene Bell Center for Regenerative Biology and Tissue Engineering and National Xenopus Resource, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts United States of America.
Lindsey M KukolyBiology Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah R BurtonEugene Bell Center for Regenerative Biology and Tissue Engineering and National Xenopus Resource, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts United States of America.
Emmanuela U AneleBiology Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jacek M KwiecienDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Marie-Theres GansaugeDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Sinthu SenthillmohanBiology Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Eli GreenbaumDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States of America.
Matthias MeyerDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Marko E HorbEugene Bell Center for Regenerative Biology and Tissue Engineering and National Xenopus Resource, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts United States of America.
Ben J EvansBiology Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9512-8845
McMaster University · CAMarine Biological Laboratory · USMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEAhmadu Bello University · NGOregon State University · USThe University of Texas at El Paso · US

Funding

Resource CoreP40OD010997 · OD · MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY · PI Marko E Horb · 2012 to 2026
$13.1M
Xenopus models of human disease by targeted genome editingR01HD084409 · NICHD · MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY · PI HORB, MARKO E · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084409NIH HHS P40 OD010997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic triggers for sex determination are frequently co-inherited with other linked genes that may also influence one or more sex-specific phenotypes. To better understand how sex-limited regions evolve and function, we studied a small W chromosome-specific region of the frog Xenopus laevis that contains only three genes (dm-w, scan-w, ccdc69-w) and that drives female differentiation. Using gene editing, we found that the sex-determining function of this region requires dm-w but that scan-w and ccdc69-w are not essential for viability, female development, or fertility. Analysis of mesonephros+gonad transcriptomes during sexual differentiation illustrates masculinization of the dm-w knockout transcriptome, and identifies mostly non-overlapping sets of differentially expressed genes in separate knockout lines for each of these three W-specific gene compared to wildtype sisters. Capture sequencing of almost all Xenopus species and PCR surveys indicate that the female-determining function of dm-w is present in only a subset of species that carry this gene. These findings map out a dynamic evolutionary history of a newly evolved W chromosome-specific genomic region, whose components have distinctive functions that frequently degraded during Xenopus diversification, and evidence the evolutionary consequences of recombination suppression.

Indexed as

Sex Determination ProcessesTranscription FactorsAnimalsChromosomesFemaleGenomicsMaleXenopus laevisTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID37792893
PMCPMC10578606
OpenAlexW4387330788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.