Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792870›Full record

ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2023

First management of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 akin to the vital head and neck region and thyroid gland bed: trust, but be careful whom (you trust)?

Tuna Albayrak, Hülya Yanal, Demet Sengul, Ilker Sengul, Mehmet Albayrak, Selin Eyüpoğlu, Ali Muhtaroğlu, Esma Cinar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Thyroid function after menopause: is there any concern in thyroidology?Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tuna AlbayrakGiresun University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation - Giresun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0222-9277
Hülya YanalGiresun Prof. Dr. A. Ilhan Ozdemir State Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation - Giresun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6451-1497
Demet SengulGiresun University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology - Giresun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0416-0621
Ilker SengulGiresun University, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Endocrine Surgery - Giresun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5217-0755
Mehmet AlbayrakKaradeniz Technical University, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Perinatology - Giresun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2371-6437
Selin EyüpoğluGiresun University, Ministry of Health Education and Research Hospital, Division of Intensive Care Unit - Giresun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2132-4605
Ali MuhtaroğluGiresun University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery - Giresun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5412-2175
Esma CinarGiresun University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology - Giresun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7993-1056
Giresun University · TRKaradeniz Technical University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients.

methodsA total of 48 patients who underwent percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy, with 24 COVID-19 patients (Group C) and 24 non-COVID-19 patients (Group N), were included in the study. Patients' demographic features including age and gender, time to intubation, duration of intubation, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores, comorbidities, duration of opening tracheostomy, complications, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care units, and mortality were recorded and compared between the groups.

resultsThere was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age and gender (p=0.558 and p=0.110, respectively). Time to intubation was significantly more prolonged, and intubation follow-up duration was significantly shorter in Group C compared to Group N (p=0.034 and p=0.002, respectively). The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score was statistically significantly higher in Group N compared with Group C (p=0.012). The most common comorbidity was hypertension in 29 (60.4%) patients, followed by cerebrovascular disease in 19 (39.6%) patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding mortality (p=0.212).

conclusionThis study suggests that percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy can be performed safely in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. However, COVID-19 patients may have a longer time to intubation and shorter intubation follow-up duration than non-COVID-19 patients. The study also found a higher incidence of complications in COVID-19 patients undergoing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. These results emphasize the importance of careful patient selection, meticulous technique, and close postoperative monitoring in patients undergoing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy, particularly in those with COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19TracheostomyHumansSARS-CoV-2Thyroid GlandTrust

Identifiers

PMID37792870
PMCPMC10547483
OpenAlexW4387028727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.