Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792828›Full record

ArticleRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2023

Frequency And Factors Associated With Adverse Reactions After Administration of Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine Among Health Workers.

Beray Gelmez Taş, İlknur Demir, Muhammed Basanmay, Güzin Zeren Öztürk, Bestegül Çoruh Akyol, Merve Hicret Tektaş, Hacı Mustafa Özdemir

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beray Gelmez TaşUniversity of Health Sciences, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, Department of Family Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7126-0024
İlknur DemirUniversity of Health Sciences, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, Department of Family Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0055-7186
Muhammed BasanmayUniversity of Health Sciences, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, Department of Family Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6952-4887
Güzin Zeren ÖztürkUniversity of Health Sciences, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, Department of Family Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7730-2929
Bestegül Çoruh AkyolOrdu University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Ordu, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-683X
Merve Hicret TektaşSapanca Public Hospital, Department of Family Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3346-8262
Hacı Mustafa ÖzdemirUniversity of Health Sciences, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6189-3605
Izmir University · TROrdu University · TRSivas State Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) has precipitated a significant public health crisis. Our study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors associated with adverse reactions to the inactivated CoronaVac vaccine.

methodsThe study involved voluntary health workers who received CoronaVac vaccine. We documented the sociodemographic information of 2,019 participants who volunteered for our study. Of these, 1,964 and 1,702 participants were interviewed by phone 1 month after the first and second dose, respectively, during which they were queried about any adverse reactions.

resultsWithin the first week after the first dose, adverse reactions were observed in 856 (43.3%) participants, with 133 (6.7%) experiencing them during the second week, and 96 (4.9%) people at the end of the first month. For the second dose, 276 individuals (16.2%) reported adverse reactions. The prevalence of both local and systemic adverse events ranged from 9.5-11.2% overall. Fatigue was the most common adverse reaction overall, while pain at the injection site was the most frequent local adverse reaction.

conclusionsThe evaluation of both systemic and local side effects revealed no significant adverse reactions to the inactivated CoronaVac vaccine (Sinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China). Our study found that the incidence of systemic and local adverse responses to the CoronaVac vaccination was lower than the rates reported in studies involving the recombinant adenovirus type-5, BNT162b1, and ChAdOx1nCoV-19 COVID-19 vaccines, all of which underwent the World Health Organization LULUC/PQ evaluation process.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdenoviridaeAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineHumansVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 Vaccinessinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID37792828
PMCPMC10550098
OpenAlexW4386959709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.