Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792787›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Nutritional programming in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): Effect of low dietary protein on growth and the intestinal microbiome and transcriptome.

Courtney A Deck, Scott A Salger, Hannah M Reynolds, Michael D Tada, Madeline E Severance, Peter Ferket, Hillary S Egna, Mst Kaniz Fatema, Shahroz M Haque, Russell J Borski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Courtney A DeckDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Scott A SalgerDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8724-6481
Hannah M ReynoldsDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Michael D TadaDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Madeline E SeveranceDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Peter FerketDepartment of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Hillary S EgnaDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
Mst Kaniz FatemaFaculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Shahroz M HaqueFaculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-4585-4301
Russell J BorskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9442-7221
North Carolina State University · USBangladesh Agricultural University · BDOregon State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutritional programming is the idea that early nutrient contributions can influence organismal structure or function and is documented in a variety of vertebrates, yet studies in fish are largely lacking. Tilapia are an important foodfish, with global production having increased rapidly since the 1990s. They exhibit high disease-resistance and grow well on formulated feeds which makes them an ideal aquaculture species, however incorporating high quality proteins into feeds can be costly. As feed constitutes 50-70% of total production costs in aquaculture, reducing protein content could curb these costs and increase revenue. Thus, we examined the effects of feeding Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) fry a restricted protein diet for the first 7-21 days on growth, gut microbial flora, and the intestinal transcriptome. Fish were fed either a 25% restricted or 48% control crude protein starter (ST) diet for up to 21 days and then switched to a 25% or 38% control crude protein growout (GO) diet. Fish fed a 25% ST diet for 14 days followed by a 38% GO diet had significantly higher lengths and weights and better feed efficiency than fish fed the control 48% ST and 38% GO diet after 56 days of culture. Growth of fry on the 25% ST, 7-day/38% GO and the 25% ST,7-day/25% GO diets did not differ from the those fed the control protein diets, while fish fed the 25% ST diet for 21 days had significantly lower growth and survival rates. We observed no significant differences in either alpha or beta diversity of the gut microbial flora between diets, however species richness (Shannon Index) was higher in fry fed the 25% protein ST diet regardless of the GO diet. Similarly, fish fed the 25% ST diet for 14 days followed by the 38% GO diet had minimal changes to the intestinal transcriptome relative to fish fed the control 48% ST and 38% GO diet. However, those fed 25% ST and GO diets for the entire 56 days exhibited substantial differences in the gut transcriptome from other groups showing gene expression profiles characteristic of detrimental changes to gut physiology, protein metabolism and immune function. Results suggest protein restriction for up to 14 days early in development leads to enhanced growth and feed efficiency with minimal effects on gut microbes or intestinal function. Protein restriction beyond this period appears detrimental to fish growth and health as underscored by expression of disease related genes and higher mortality rates.

Indexed as

CichlidsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal FeedAnimalsDietDietary ProteinsDietary SupplementsDiet, Protein-RestrictedTranscriptomeDietary Proteins

Identifiers

PMID37792787
PMCPMC10550151
OpenAlexW4387331443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.