ArticlePloS one2023
Federated learning based futuristic biomedical big-data analysis and standardization.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Progress in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Preparation of High-Quality Biomaterials.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Standardization and Interoperability: Federated Learning's Impact on EHR Systems and Health Informatics.Advances in health information science and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical data processing and analytics exert significant influence in furnishing dependable decision support for prospective biomedical applications. Given the sensitive nature of medical data, specialized techniques and frameworks tailored for application-centric processing are imperative. This article presents a conceptualization for the analysis and uniformitarian of datasets through the implementation of Federated Learning (FL). The realm of medical big data stems from diverse origins, necessitating the delineation of data provenance and attribute paradigms to facilitate feature extraction and dependency assessment. The architecture governing the data collection framework is intricately linked to remote data transmission, thereby engendering efficient customization oversight. The operational methodology unfolds across four strata: the data origin layer, data acquisition layer, data classification layer, and data optimization layer. Central to this endeavor are multi-objective optimal datasets (MooM), characterized by attribute-driven feature cartography and cluster categorization through the conduit of federated learning models. The orchestration of feature synchronization and parameter extraction transpires across multiple tiers of neural networking, culminating in the provisioning of a steadfast remedy through dataset standardization and labeling. The empirical findings reflect the efficacy of the proposed technique, boasting an impressive 97.34% accuracy rate in the disentanglement and clustering of telemedicine data, facilitated by the operational servers within the ambit of the federated model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.