Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792728›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Plant, pigment, and bone processing in the Neolithic of northern Arabia-New evidence from Use-wear analysis of grinding tools at Jebel Oraf.

Giulio Lucarini, Maria Guagnin, Ceri Shipton, Anita Radini, Abdullah M Alsharekh, Michael Petraglia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giulio LucariniInstitute of Heritage Science, National Research Council of Italy, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4722-1065
Maria GuagninDepartment of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7995-8611
Ceri ShiptonInstitute of Archaeology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anita RadiniSchool of Archaeology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Abdullah M AlsharekhDepartment of Archaeology, College of Tourism and Archaeology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2666-3262
Michael PetragliaAustralian Research Centre for Human Evolution, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Archaeological sites with surface hearths are a ubiquitous feature across the arid zones of the Arabian interior. At Jebel Oraf, in the Jubbah basin of the Nefud Desert of northern Arabia, numerous grinding stone fragments were found in association with hearths, though the original purpose of these stones was unclear owing to the poor preservation of faunal and botanic remains. Here we describe results from use-wear analysis on five grinding tools at Jebel Oraf, demonstrating that such artefacts were used during the Neolithic for plant processing, bone processing, and pigment production. Grinding stones were often broken up after initial use and fragments were subsequently re-used for alternative purposes, before finally being placed on hearths or discarded. More specifically, plants were ground or prepared and possibly cooked in the hearths, and bones were processed as well. The analyses also highlight the importance of pigment processing at Neolithic sites and provide a link to painted rock art. The frequent use of pigment in the archaeological record suggests that pigment was widely used, and that Neolithic painted art may have been more common than the surviving images suggest.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyBone and BonesArabiaArtifacts

Identifiers

PMID37792728
PMCPMC10550130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.