Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792724›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: Do testimonials by experts work?

Olesya M Savchenko, Leah H Palm-Forster, Lusi Xie, Rubait Rahman, Kent D Messer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olesya M SavchenkoFood and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7679-2919
Leah H Palm-ForsterDepartment of Applied Economics and Statistics, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.
Lusi XieDepartment of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Rubait RahmanDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Kent D MesserDepartment of Applied Economics and Statistics, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using non-pecuniary interventions to motivate pro-environmental behavior appeals to program administrators seeking cost-effective ways to increase adoption of environmental practices. However, all good-intended interventions should not be expected to be effective and reporting when interventions fail is as important as documenting their successes. We used a framed field experiment with 308 adults from the Mid-Atlantic in the United States to test the effectiveness of an expert testimonial in encouraging adoption of native plants in residential settings. Though studies have found testimonials to be effective in other contexts, we find that the video testimonial had no effect on residents' willingness to pay for native plants. Our analysis also shows that consumers who are younger, have higher incomes, and use other environmentally friendly practices on their lawns are more likely than other consumers to purchase native plants.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesConsumer BehaviorAdultEnvironmentHumans

Identifiers

PMID37792724
PMCPMC10550155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.