Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792702›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Target trial emulation: Do antimicrobials or gastrointestinal nutraceuticals prescribed at first presentation for acute diarrhoea cause a better clinical outcome in dogs under primary veterinary care in the UK?

Camilla Pegram, Karla Diaz-Ordaz, Dave C Brodbelt, Yu-Mei Chang, Sarah Tayler, Fergus Allerton, Lauren Prisk, David B Church, Dan G O'Neill

Abstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Camilla PegramPathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Herts, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8367-5294
Karla Diaz-OrdazDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Dave C BrodbeltPathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Herts, United Kingdom.
Yu-Mei ChangResearch Support Office, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Herts, United Kingdom.
Sarah TaylerClinical Sciences and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Herts, United Kingdom.
Fergus AllertonWillows Veterinary Centre & Referral Centre, Solihull, United Kingdom.
Lauren PriskPathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Herts, United Kingdom.
David B ChurchClinical Sciences and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Herts, United Kingdom.
Dan G O'NeillPathobiology and Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Herts, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1115-2723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Target trial emulation applies design principles from randomised controlled trials to the analysis of observational data for causal inference and is increasingly used within human epidemiology. Veterinary electronic clinical records represent a potentially valuable source of information to estimate real-world causal effects for companion animal species. This study employed the target trial framework to evaluate the usefulness on veterinary observational data. Acute diarrhoea in dogs was used as a clinical exemplar. Inclusion required dogs aged ≥ 3 months and < 10 years, presenting for veterinary primary care with acute diarrhoea during 2019. Treatment strategies were: 1. antimicrobial prescription compared to no antimicrobial prescription and 2. gastrointestinal nutraceutical prescription compared to no gastrointestinal nutraceutical prescription. The primary outcome was clinical resolution (defined as no revisit with ongoing diarrhoea within 30 days from the date of first presentation). Informed from a directed acyclic graph, data on the following covariates were collected: age, breed, bodyweight, insurance status, comorbidities, vomiting, reduced appetite, haematochezia, pyrexia, duration, additional treatment prescription and veterinary group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance covariates between the treatment groups for each of the two target trials. The risk difference (RD) of 0.4% (95% CI -4.5% to 5.3%) was non-significant for clinical resolution in dogs treated with antimicrobials compared with dogs not treated with antimicrobials. The risk difference (RD) of 0.3% (95% CI -4.5% to 5.0%) was non-significant for clinical resolution in dogs treated with gastrointestinal nutraceuticals compared with dogs not treated with gastrointestinal nutraceuticals. This study successfully applied the target trial framework to veterinary observational data. The findings show that antimicrobial or gastrointestinal prescription at first presentation of acute diarrhoea in dogs causes no difference in clinical resolution. The findings support the recommendation for veterinary professionals to limit antimicrobial use for acute diarrhoea in dogs.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAnimalsDiarrheaDogsPrescriptionsUnited KingdomVomitingAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID37792702
PMCPMC10550114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.