ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2023
BCI-Utility Metric for Asynchronous P300 Brain-Computer Interface Systems.
Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ChatBCI, a P300 speller BCI with context-driven word prediction leveraging large language models, from concept to evaluation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) was envisioned as an assistive technology option for people with severe movement impairments. The traditional synchronous event-related potential (ERP) BCI design uses a fixed communication speed and is vulnerable to variations in attention. Recent ERP BCI designs have added asynchronous features, including abstention and dynamic stopping, but it remains a open question of how to evaluate asynchronous BCI performance. In this work, we build on the BCI-Utility metric to create the first evaluation metric with special consideration of the asynchronous features of self-paced BCIs. This metric considers accuracy as all of the following three - probability of a correct selection when a selection was intended, probability of making a selection when a selection was intended, and probability of an abstention when an abstention was intended. Further, it considers the average time required for a selection when using dynamic stopping and the proportion of intended selections versus abstentions. We establish the validity of the derived metric via extensive simulations, and illustrate and discuss its practical usage on real-world BCI data. We describe the relative contribution of different inputs with plots of BCI-Utility curves under different parameter settings. Generally, the BCI-Utility metric increases as any of the accuracy values increase and decreases as the expected time for an intended selection increases. Furthermore, in many situations, we find shortening the expected time of an intended selection is the most effective way to improve the BCI-Utility, which necessitates the advancement of asynchronous BCI systems capable of accurate abstention and dynamic stopping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.