Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792637›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2024

Short-course radiation with consolidation chemotherapy does not increase operative morbidity compared to long-course chemoradiation: A retrospective study of the US rectal cancer consortium.

Philip S Bauer, Adriana C Gamboa, Ebunoluwa E Otegbeye, William C Chapman, Samantha Rivard, Scott Regenbogen, Maryam Mohammed, Jennifer Holder-Murray, Jason T Wiseman, Aslam Ejaz and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Philip S BauerDepartment of Surgery, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Adriana C GamboaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5464-2178
Ebunoluwa E OtegbeyeDepartment of Surgery, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
William C ChapmanDepartment of Surgery, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Samantha RivardDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Scott RegenbogenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Maryam MohammedDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jennifer Holder-MurrayDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jason T WisemanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6585-8046
Aslam EjazDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1387-2604
Kamren Edwards-HollingsworthSection of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of General Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Alexander T HawkinsSection of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of General Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Steven R HuntDepartment of Surgery, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Glen BalchDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Matthew L SilvieraDepartment of Surgery, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USEmory University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

SURGICAL ONCOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32CA009621 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN, William E. Gillanders · 1988 to 2026
$12.9M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009621NCI NIH HHS T32CA009621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesNeoadjuvant short-course radiation and consolidation chemotherapy (SC TNT) remains less widely used for rectal cancer in the United States than long-course chemoradiation (LCRT). SC TNT may improve compliance and downstaging; however, a longer radiation-to-surgery interval may worsen pelvic fibrosis and morbidity with total mesorectal excision (TME). A single, US-center retrospective analysis has shown comparable risk of morbidity after neoadjuvant short-course radiation with consolidation chemotherapy (SC TNT) and long-course chemoradiation (LCRT). Validation by a multi-institutional study is needed.

methodsThe US Rectal Cancer Consortium database (2010-2018) was retrospectively reviewed for patients with nonmetastatic, rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant LCRT or SC TNT before TME. The primary endpoint was severe postoperative morbidity. Cohorts were compared by univariate analysis. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the odds of severe complication.

resultsOf 788 included patients, 151 (19%) received SC TNT and 637 (81%) LCRT. The SC TNT group had fewer distal tumors (33.8% vs. 50.2%, p < 0.0001) and more clinical node-positive disease (74.2% vs. 47.6%, p < 0.0001). The intraoperative complication rate was similar (SC TNT 5.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.65). There was no difference in overall postoperative morbidity (38.4% vs. 46.3%, p = 0.08). Severe morbidity was similar with low anterior resection (9.1% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.10) and abdominoperineal resection (24.4% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.49). SC TNT did not increase the odds of severe morbidity relative to LCRT on multivariable analysis (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.37-1.10).

conclusionsSC TNT does not increase morbidity after TME for rectal cancer relative to LCRT. Concern for surgical complications should not discourage the use of SC TNT when aiming to increase the likelihood of complete clinical response.

Indexed as

Consolidation ChemotherapyRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingRetrospective Studiesmorbidityrectal cancershort-course radiationtotal neoadjuvant therapy

Identifiers

PMID37792637
PMCPMC10872853
OpenAlexW4387331671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.