Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792444›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

A Natural Language Processing Model for COVID-19 Detection Based on Dutch General Practice Electronic Health Records by Using Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers: Development and Validation Study.

Maarten Homburg, Eline Meijer, Matthijs Berends, Thijmen Kupers, Tim Olde Hartman, Jean Muris, Evelien de Schepper, Premysl Velek, Jeroen Kuiper, Marjolein Berger and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Large Language Models and Primary Care: A Scoping Review.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maarten HomburgDepartment of Primary- and Long-Term Care, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3295-4656
Eline MeijerDepartment of Primary- and Long-Term Care, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-6901-7011
Matthijs BerendsDepartment of Primary- and Long-Term Care, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7620-1800
Thijmen KupersDepartment of Primary- and Long-Term Care, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-4958-7488
Tim Olde HartmanDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2078-1206
Jean MurisCare and Public Health Research Institute, Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8780-476X
Evelien de SchepperDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1896-6343
Premysl VelekDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-6211
Jeroen KuiperMunicipal Health Service Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9831-1381
Marjolein BergerDepartment of Primary- and Long-Term Care, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6774-5961
Lilian PetersDepartment of Primary- and Long-Term Care, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2342-0799

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural language processing (NLP) models such as bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) hold promise in revolutionizing disease identification from electronic health records (EHRs) by potentially enhancing efficiency and accuracy. However, their practical application in practice settings demands a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to development and validation. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted challenges in disease identification due to limited testing availability and challenges in handling unstructured data. In the Netherlands, where general practitioners (GPs) serve as the first point of contact for health care, EHRs generated by these primary care providers contain a wealth of potentially valuable information. Nonetheless, the unstructured nature of free-text entries in EHRs poses challenges in identifying trends, detecting disease outbreaks, or accurately pinpointing COVID-19 cases.

objectiveThis study aims to develop and validate a BERT model for detecting COVID-19 consultations in general practice EHRs in the Netherlands.

methodsThe BERT model was initially pretrained on Dutch language data and fine-tuned using a comprehensive EHR data set comprising confirmed COVID-19 GP consultations and non-COVID-19-related consultations. The data set was partitioned into a training and development set, and the model's performance was evaluated on an independent test set that served as the primary measure of its effectiveness in COVID-19 detection. To validate the final model, its performance was assessed through 3 approaches. First, external validation was applied on an EHR data set from a different geographic region in the Netherlands. Second, validation was conducted using results of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test data obtained from municipal health services. Lastly, correlation between predicted outcomes and COVID-19-related hospitalizations in the Netherlands was assessed, encompassing the period around the outbreak of the pandemic in the Netherlands, that is, the period before widespread testing.

resultsThe model development used 300,359 GP consultations. We developed a highly accurate model for COVID-19 consultations (accuracy 0.97, F

conclusionsThe developed BERT model was able to accurately identify COVID-19 cases among GP consultations even preceding confirmed cases. The validated efficacy of our BERT model highlights the potential of NLP models to identify disease outbreaks early, exemplifying the power of multidisciplinary efforts in harnessing technology for disease identification. Moreover, the implications of this study extend beyond COVID-19 and offer a blueprint for the early recognition of various illnesses, revealing that such models could revolutionize disease surveillance.

Indexed as

COVID-19General PracticeElectronic Health RecordsHumansNatural Language ProcessingPandemicsBERT modelCOVID-19disease identificationEHRelectronic health recordsmodel developmentmultidisciplinarynatural language processingNLPpredictionprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID37792444
PMCPMC10563863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.