Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792375›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Comprehensive Telehealth Model to Support Diabetes Self-Management.

Grazia Aleppo, Robin L Gal, Dan Raghinaru, Davida Kruger, Roy W Beck, Richard M Bergenstal, Terra Cushman, Korey K Hood, Mary L Johnson, Teresa McArthur and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Expanding Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Management and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinician, Youth, and Parent Perspectives on Diabetes Technology Education.The science of diabetes self-management and care · 2025
    Article
  8. Clin-STAR Corner: Practice Changing Advances in Diabetes Care.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. What's New and Around the Corner in CGM?Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advancing Cardiovascular, Kidney, and Metabolic Medicine: A Narrative Review of Insights and Innovations for the Future.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Grazia AleppoNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Robin L GalJaeb Center for Health and Research, Tampa, Florida.
Dan RaghinaruJaeb Center for Health and Research, Tampa, Florida.
Davida KrugerHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Roy W BeckJaeb Center for Health and Research, Tampa, Florida.
Richard M BergenstalInternational Diabetes Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Terra CushmanHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Korey K HoodStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Mary L JohnsonInternational Diabetes Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Teresa McArthurCecelia Health, New York, New York.
Amy BradshawCecelia Health, New York, New York.
Beth A OlsonLagoon Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sean M OserUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Tamara K OserUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Craig KollmanJaeb Center for Health and Research, Tampa, Florida.
Ruth S WeinstockSUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Jaeb Center for Health Research · USHenry Ford Health System · USIbis Reproductive Health · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USNorthwestern University · USStanford University · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: As the number of patients with diabetes continues to increase in the United States, novel approaches to clinical care access should be considered to meet the care needs for this population, including support for diabetes-related technology. Objective: To evaluate a virtual clinic to facilitate comprehensive diabetes care, support continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) integration into diabetes self-management, and provide behavioral health support for diabetes-related issues. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was a prospective, single-arm, remote study involving adult participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who were referred through community resources. The study was conducted virtually from August 24, 2020, to May 26, 2022; analysis was conducted at the clinical coordinating center. Intervention: Training and education led by a Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist for CGM use through a virtual endocrinology clinic structure, which included endocrinologists and behavioral health team members. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes included CGM-measured mean glucose level, coefficient of variation, and time in range (TIR) of 70 to 180 mg/dL, time with values greater than 180 mg/dL or 250 mg/dL, and time with values less than 70 mg/dL or 54 mg/dL. Hemoglobin A1c was measured at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks. Results: Among the 234 participants, 160 had type 1 diabetes and 74 had type 2 diabetes. The mean (SD) age was 47 (14) years, 123 (53%) were female, and median diabetes duration was 20 years. Median (IQR) CGM use over 6 months was 96% (91%-98%) for participants with type 1 diabetes and 94% (85%-97%) for those with type 2 diabetes. Mean (SD) hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in those with type 1 diabetes decreased from 7.8% (1.6%) at baseline to 7.1% (1.0%) at 3 months and 7.1% (1.0%) at 6 months (mean change from baseline to 6 months, -0.6%, 95% CI, -0.8% to -0.5%; P < .001), with an 11% mean TIR increase over 6 months (95% CI, 9% to 14%; P < .001). Mean HbA1c in participants with type 2 diabetes decreased from 8.1% (1.7%) at baseline to 7.1% (1.0%) at 3 months and 7.1% (0.9%) at 6 months (mean change from baseline to 6 months, -1.0%; 95% CI, -1.4% to -0.7%; P < .001), with an 18% TIR increase over 6 months (95% CI, 13% to 24%; P < .001). In participants with type 1 diabetes, mean percentage of time with values less than 70 mg/dL and less than 54 mg/dL decreased over 6 months by 0.8% (95% CI, -1.2% to -0.4%; P = .001) and by 0.3% (95% CI, -0.5% to -0.2%, P < .001), respectively. In the type 2 diabetes group, hypoglycemia was rare (mean [SD] percentage of time <70 mg/dL, 0.5% [0.6%]; and <54 mg/dL, 0.07% [0.14%], over 6 months). Conclusions and Relevance: Results from this cohort study demonstrated clinical benefits associated with implementation of a comprehensive care model that included diabetes education. This model of care has potential to reach a large portion of patients with diabetes, facilitate diabetes technology adoption, and improve glucose control.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Self-ManagementTelemedicineAdultBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringCohort StudiesFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID37792375
PMCPMC10551767
OpenAlexW4387326165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.