ArticleJAMA network open2023
Comprehensive Telehealth Model to Support Diabetes Self-Management.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in cardio-kidney-metabolic care: Transforming integrated disease management through data-informed innovation.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Review
- Article
- Evaluation of the Medical Utilization of the Telemedicine Pilot Project for Patients With Diabetes Based on Korean National Health Insurance Claims Data.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- The Expanding Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Management and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Review
- Health Service Leaders' Perspectives on Type 1 Diabetes Models of Care for Children and Young Adults in Australia: A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
- Analysis of experiences on telemedicine pilot projects from the perspectives of doctors, pharmacists, and patients.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
- Clinician, Youth, and Parent Perspectives on Diabetes Technology Education.The science of diabetes self-management and care · 2025Article
- Clin-STAR Corner: Practice Changing Advances in Diabetes Care.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Review
- Caregiver experiences of an integrative patient-centered digital health application for pediatric type 1 diabetes care: Findings from a pilot clinical trial.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- What's New and Around the Corner in CGM?Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025Article
- Improving Diabetes Monitoring in People with Sub-optimally Controlled Diabetes: Implementing a Clinical Laboratory-Led Quality Improvement Initiative in General Practice.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025Article
- Inconvenience, lifestyle flexibility, glycemic control, and satisfaction with insulin treatment among patients with diabetes mellitus in palestine: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancing Cardiovascular, Kidney, and Metabolic Medicine: A Narrative Review of Insights and Innovations for the Future.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025Review
- Your PCP Has Entered the Chat: How Asynchronous Portal Messages Can Be Leveraged for Chronic Disease Management Outside of the Clinic Visit.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Distinct Roles of Common Genetic Variants and Their Contributions to Diabetes: MODY and Uncontrolled T2DM.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- The impact of a value-based hospital-community-family linkage program on blood glucose management and hypoglycemia in elderly diabetic patients: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Perceptions of a comprehensive telehealth intervention in patients with persistently poor type 2 diabetes control.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Pandemic-driven healthcare disruptions and their disproportionate impact on patients with diabetes: evidence from Texas.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
- Bridging the digital divide: student-led literacy initiatives in diabetes management.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2025Review
- Age-related variations in HbA1c improvements: insights from a telehealth-supported community-based intervention.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: As the number of patients with diabetes continues to increase in the United States, novel approaches to clinical care access should be considered to meet the care needs for this population, including support for diabetes-related technology. Objective: To evaluate a virtual clinic to facilitate comprehensive diabetes care, support continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) integration into diabetes self-management, and provide behavioral health support for diabetes-related issues. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was a prospective, single-arm, remote study involving adult participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who were referred through community resources. The study was conducted virtually from August 24, 2020, to May 26, 2022; analysis was conducted at the clinical coordinating center. Intervention: Training and education led by a Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist for CGM use through a virtual endocrinology clinic structure, which included endocrinologists and behavioral health team members. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes included CGM-measured mean glucose level, coefficient of variation, and time in range (TIR) of 70 to 180 mg/dL, time with values greater than 180 mg/dL or 250 mg/dL, and time with values less than 70 mg/dL or 54 mg/dL. Hemoglobin A1c was measured at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks. Results: Among the 234 participants, 160 had type 1 diabetes and 74 had type 2 diabetes. The mean (SD) age was 47 (14) years, 123 (53%) were female, and median diabetes duration was 20 years. Median (IQR) CGM use over 6 months was 96% (91%-98%) for participants with type 1 diabetes and 94% (85%-97%) for those with type 2 diabetes. Mean (SD) hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in those with type 1 diabetes decreased from 7.8% (1.6%) at baseline to 7.1% (1.0%) at 3 months and 7.1% (1.0%) at 6 months (mean change from baseline to 6 months, -0.6%, 95% CI, -0.8% to -0.5%; P < .001), with an 11% mean TIR increase over 6 months (95% CI, 9% to 14%; P < .001). Mean HbA1c in participants with type 2 diabetes decreased from 8.1% (1.7%) at baseline to 7.1% (1.0%) at 3 months and 7.1% (0.9%) at 6 months (mean change from baseline to 6 months, -1.0%; 95% CI, -1.4% to -0.7%; P < .001), with an 18% TIR increase over 6 months (95% CI, 13% to 24%; P < .001). In participants with type 1 diabetes, mean percentage of time with values less than 70 mg/dL and less than 54 mg/dL decreased over 6 months by 0.8% (95% CI, -1.2% to -0.4%; P = .001) and by 0.3% (95% CI, -0.5% to -0.2%, P < .001), respectively. In the type 2 diabetes group, hypoglycemia was rare (mean [SD] percentage of time <70 mg/dL, 0.5% [0.6%]; and <54 mg/dL, 0.07% [0.14%], over 6 months). Conclusions and Relevance: Results from this cohort study demonstrated clinical benefits associated with implementation of a comprehensive care model that included diabetes education. This model of care has potential to reach a large portion of patients with diabetes, facilitate diabetes technology adoption, and improve glucose control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.