Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792163›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2024

Effects of intermittent pneumatic compression on the recovery of cardiovascular parameters after repeated sprint exercise.

Arnau Artés, Pau Ferrer-Ramos, Casimiro Javierre, Ginés Viscor, Iker García

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arnau ArtésDepartament de Biologia Cellular, Fisiologia I Immunologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal, 643, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Pau Ferrer-RamosDepartament de Biologia Cellular, Fisiologia I Immunologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal, 643, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1163-2113
Casimiro JavierreDepartament de Ciències Fisiològiques, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9591-4897
Ginés ViscorDepartament de Biologia Cellular, Fisiologia I Immunologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal, 643, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-2346
Iker GarcíaDepartament de Biologia Cellular, Fisiologia I Immunologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal, 643, 08028, Barcelona, Spain. ikergarciaalday@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2721-5904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) applies gradual pressure to facilitate lymph and blood flow movement to reduce exercise-induced tissue fluid accumulation and plasma volume loss. This study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular system response during the recovery with IPC compared with passive recovery (Sham).

methodsSixteen volunteers (7 females and 9 males) executed a cycling-based exhausting sprint interval exercise (8 × 20 s all out), followed by a 30-min IPC or Sham condition. Participants performed two trials in a randomised, counterbalanced, and crossover design. Several cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure, heart function, and peripheral vascular resistance) were recorded at baseline (5'), through the recovery protocol (30'), and afterwards (5').

resultsThe use of IPC during the recovery phase led to a faster recovery, stated in relative values to pre-exercise, in mean blood pressure (102.5 ± 19.3% vs. 92.7 ± 12.5%; P < 0.001), and cardiac output (139.8 ± 30.0% vs. 146.2 ± 40.2%; P < 0.05) in comparison to Sham condition. Furthermore, during the IPC-based recovery, there was a slower recovery in cardiac pressure change over time (92.5 ± 25.8% vs. 100.5 ± 48.9%; P < 0.05), and a faster return to pre-exercise values in the peripheral vascular resistance (75.2 ± 25.5% vs. 64.8 ± 17.4%; P < 0.001) compared to Sham.

conclusionThe application of IPC after high-intensity exercise promotes the recovery of the cardiovascular system, reducing cardiovascular strain. Future investigations should consider the effects on the sympathetic-parasympathetic balance, such as heart rate variability, to assess further bonds between the use of IPC and autonomous control.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular SystemIntermittent Pneumatic Compression DevicesBlood PressureCross-Over StudiesExerciseFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleBlood pressureCardiovascular systemHeart ratePneumatic compressionSports recoverySprint interval training

Identifiers

PMID37792163
PMCPMC10954933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.