Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792162›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

Cancer center-based follow-up among pediatric and adolescent/young adult cancer survivors: the role of a community-based organization and the social determinants of health.

Emily M Pang, Olga Saynina, Lidia Schapira, Paul H Wise, Heidi Boynton, Mary Smith, Lisa J Chamberlain, Stephanie M Smith

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Disparities in Rural-Urban Cancer Care Outcomes among Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Populations: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily M PangStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Olga SayninaCenter for Policy, Outcomes, and Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lidia SchapiraDepartment of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Paul H WiseCenter for Policy, Outcomes, and Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Heidi BoyntonJacob's Heart Children's Cancer Support Services, Watsonville, CA, USA.
Mary SmithJacob's Heart Children's Cancer Support Services, Watsonville, CA, USA.
Lisa J Chamberlain *Center for Policy, Outcomes, and Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stephanie M Smith *Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation & Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 750 Welch Rd, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. smithsm@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USJacob's Heart Children's Cancer Support Services · USCancer Prevention Institute of California · US

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdherence to survivorship care is suboptimal among pediatric and adolescent/young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. We evaluated predictors of cancer center-based follow-up among pediatric/AYA cancer survivors, with an emphasis on social determinants of health (SDOH).

methodsThis retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data at an academic medical center to identify patients aged 0-29 years at last cancer treatment who completed treatment 2010-2019. Cancer center-based follow-up was defined by oncology or survivorship clinic visits through 12/31/2022. Multivariate logistic regression models (overall, ages 0-19 [pediatric], 20-29 [YA]) evaluated the association of demographics, clinical/treatment characteristics, and SDOH (insurance type, distance to cancer center, area deprivation index) with clinic attendance. Further modeling accounted for the service area of a community-based organization (CBO) that supports families of children with cancer.

resultsA total of 2210 survivors were included (56% pediatric, 44% YA; 66% non-White). Cancer center-based follow-up decreased from 94% 1-year post-treatment to 35% at > 5-7 years. In adjusted analysis, AYAs had the lowest follow-up (5-7 years post-treatment: OR 0.25 [0.15-0.41] for age 25-29; OR 0.25 [0.16-0.41] for age 20-24; OR 0.32 [0.20-0.52] for age 15-19). Survivors residing within the CBO service area were twice as likely to follow-up (OR 2.10 [1.34-3.29]).

conclusionsAmong a diverse population, AYA survivors were vulnerable to loss to follow-up. Other SDOH were not consistently associated with follow-up. Support from a CBO may partly explain these findings. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: CBOs may strengthen survivorship follow-up within medically underserved communities. More research is needed to understand community support in survivorship.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesCancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsSocial Determinants of HealthAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesSurvivorshipCommunity partnershipHealth disparitiesHealth equitySurvivorship follow-up

Identifiers

PMID37792162
OpenAlexW4387326061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.