Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792140›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024

Agreement of zero-heat-flux thermometry with the oesophageal and tympanic core temperature measurement in patient receiving major surgery.

Hao Liang, Jing-Yan Wang, Yan Liang, Xin-Feng Shao, Yan-Ling Ding, Hui-Qun Jia

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hao LiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Fourth Hospital Of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jing-Yan WangDepartment of ENT, Affiliated Hospital Of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Yan LiangDepartment of Obstetrics, The NO.1 Central Hospital Of Baoding City, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Xin-Feng ShaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The NO.1 Central Hospital Of Baoding City, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Yan-Ling DingDepartment of Anesthesiology, The NO.1 Central Hospital Of Baoding City, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Hui-Qun JiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Fourth Hospital Of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China. jysyjiahuiqun@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7078-1389
Baoding People's Hospital · CNHebei Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Hebei University · CN

Funding

Plan for Science and Technology Research of Baoding 2041ZF084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify and prevent perioperative hypothermia, most surgical patients require a non-invasive, accurate, convenient, and continuous core temperature method, especially for patients undergoing major surgery. This study validated the precision and accuracy of a cutaneous zero-heat-flux thermometer and its performance in detecting intraoperative hypothermia. Adults undergoing major non-cardiac surgeries with general anaesthesia were enrolled in the study. Core temperatures were measured with a zero-heat-flux thermometer, infrared tympanic membrane thermometer, and oesophagal monitoring at 15-minute intervals. Taking the average value of temperature measured in the tympanic membrane and oesophagus as a reference, we assessed the agreement using the Bland-Altman analysis and linear regression methods. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of detecting hypothermia were estimated. 103 patients and one thousand sixty-eight sets of paired temperatures were analyzed. The mean difference between zero-heat-flux and the referenced measurements was -0.03 ± 0.25 °C, with 95% limits of agreement (-0.52 °C, 0.47 °C) was narrow, with 94.5% of the differences within 0.5 °C. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.90 (95%CI 0.89-0.92). The zero-heat-flux thermometry detected hypothermia with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 90%. The zero-heat-flux thermometer is in good agreement with the reference core temperature based on tympanic and oesophagal temperature monitoring in patients undergoing major surgeries, and appears high performance in detecting hypothermia.

Indexed as

HypothermiaThermometryAdultBody TemperatureEsophagusHot TemperatureHumansMonitoring, IntraoperativeTemperatureThermometersCore temperature measurementGeneral AnesthesiaHypothermiaMajor surgeryZero heat flux

Identifiers

PMID37792140
PMCPMC10879315
OpenAlexW4387326161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.