ArticleNeurochemical research2024
Working Memory in Patients with Varying Degree of Hepatic Encephalopathy (HE): A Pilot EEG-fNIRS Study.
Article in Neurochemical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is known that patients with covert hepatic encephalopathy (CHE) exhibit working memory abnormalities, but to date there is no study comparing patients with cirrhosis with/without CHE and controls with both electrophysiological and hemodynamic data collected at the same time.Here we collected behavioral [accuracy and reaction times (RTs), electrophysiological (evoked potentials) and hemodynamic (oxygenated and deoxygenated haemoglobin) correlates of an n-back task [formed by a control (0-back) condition, a low (1-back) and a high (2-back) working memory load conditions] in patients with cirrhosis with/without CHE: (1) at baseline (n = 21, males = 15, 58±8 yrs), and by comparison with controls (n = 21, males = 15, 57±11 yrs) and (2) after a 3-month course of rifaximin (n = 18, males = 12, 61±11 yrs), and by comparison to baseline.All patients showed slower RTs (p < 0.0001) and lower P2 amplitude compared with controls (p = 0.018); moreover, patients with CHE showed reduced accuracy (p < 0.0001) compared with controls, and patients without CHE showed higher oxygenated haemoglobin in the central dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the 2-back compared with patients with CHE. Post-rifaximin, oxygenated haemoglobin increased in the central frontopolar cortex. In addition, in patients without CHE the RTs of the 2-back became comparable to those of the 0-back and P3 showed higher amplitude.In conclusion, the presence of cirrhosis seemed to have more effects than CHE on working memory at baseline. A course of treatment with rifaximin was more beneficial to patients without CHE, who probably had more room for improvement in this complex task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.