Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792098›Full record

ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR): practical implementation of annex I in pathology].

Andy Kahles, Hannah Goldschmid, Anna-Lena Volckmar, Carolin Ploeger, Daniel Kazdal, Roland Penzel, Jan Budczies, Christa Flechtenmacher, Ulrich M Gassner, Monika Brüggemann and 3 more

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. [Molecular pathological analysis through the ages].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andy KahlesPathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. andy.kahles@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Hannah Goldschmid
Anna-Lena Volckmar
Carolin Ploeger
Daniel Kazdal
Roland Penzel
Jan Budczies
Christa Flechtenmacher
Ulrich M GassnerJuristische Fakultät, Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Deutschland.
Monika BrüggemannKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Sektion für Hämatologische Spezialdiagnostik, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland.
Michael VogeserLabormedizin, Klinische Massenspektrometrie, LMU München, München, Deutschland.
Peter Schirmacher
Albrecht StenzingerPathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. albrecht.stenzinger@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR) imposes several conditions on pathology institutes that develop and use in-house in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IH-IVDs). However, not all of these conditions need to be implemented immediately after the IVDR entered into force on 26 May 2022. Based on an amending regulation of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, the requirements for IH-IVDs will be phased in. Conformity with the essential safety and performance requirements of annex I must be ensured from May 2022.

objectivesWith this article, we would like to present the practical implementation of the currently valid conditions for IH-IVDs at the Institute of Pathology at the University Hospital of Heidelberg, in order to provide possible assistance to other institutions.

conclusionsIn addition to the intensive work on the requirements for IH-IVDs, several guidance documents and handouts provide orientation for the implementation and harmonisation of the requirements for healthcare institutions mentioned in Article 5 (5). Exchange in academic network structures is also of great importance for the interpretation and practical implementation of the IVDR. For university and nonuniversity institutions, ensuring conformity with the IVDR represents a further challenge in terms of personnel and time, in addition to the essential tasks of patient care, teaching and research and the further development of methods for optimal and targeted diagnostics, as well as the maintenance of the constantly evolving quality management system.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticEuropean UnionHumansReagent Kits, DiagnosticIn-house manufacturingLaboratory-developed testsQuality Assurance in health careQuality ManagementRegulatory requirements

Identifiers

PMID37792098
PMCPMC10602947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.