Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37792090›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2023

Succession of Fungal Communities and Their Functional Profiles in a Decaying Foundation Species.

Tyler M Rippel, Gina M Wimp

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tyler M RippelDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, 3700 O Street NW, Washington, D.C., USA. tyler.mosshart.rippel@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4412-246X
Gina M WimpDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, 3700 O Street NW, Washington, D.C., USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dead plant biomass from foundation plant species is fundamental for the survival of coastal salt marshes because dead biomass aids in the vertical accretion of the ecosystem. Fungi regulate the decomposition of dead biomass, and thus play an essential role for marsh survival. Despite their importance, little is known about the compositional and functional changes of fungal communities in plant matter throughout senescence and litter decomposition. Here, we analyzed how fungal communities and their functionality change in the foundation plant species Spartina patens, which builds vast amounts of dead plant biomass (thatch) on the soil surface. We analyzed the chemical and fungal properties of live biomass, standing dead biomass (dead biomass shortly after senescence), upper thatch (top layer of litter on the soil surface), and lower thatch (bottom layer of litter on the soil surface) during September and November of 2021. We found that the chemical and fungal properties of different S. patens biomass types followed a predictable litter decomposition pattern. Notably, live biomass, standing dead biomass, upper thatch, and lower thatch all hosted unique fungal communities and litter chemistry. Functional groups present in live biomass (pathogens, epiphytes, and mycoparasites) were lost during senescence and later replaced by diverse saprotrophs. The abundance of lignocellulose saprotrophs increased throughout decomposition, with the highest abundance occurring in lower thatch. These results suggest a predictable succession of fungal communities through the senescence and decomposition of the foundation species S. patens. Our study highlights the diversity of fungal communities in a disappearing foundation species.

Indexed as

MycobiomeBiomassEcosystemFungiPlant LeavesPlantsSoilSoil MicrobiologySoilLitter decompositionMycobiomePhyllosphereSalt marshSpartina patens

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.